Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which seat is most profitable?
Seat 1 1 0.50%
Seat 2 52 25.74%
Seat 4 125 61.88%
Seat 5 7 3.47%
Seat 6 3 1.49%
Seat 7 7 3.47%
Seat 8 3 1.49%
Seat 9 1 0.50%
Seat 10 3 1.49%
Voters: 202. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2007, 08:33 PM
jafeather jafeather is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,391
Default 2011 Super Bowl location

Today the NFL owners determined who would host the Super Bowl in 2011. Three locations remained: Arizona, Indianapolis, and North Texas. Supposedly, Arizona was considered an extreme longshot (since they are hosting in '08) and the decision was basically between the other two. Neither Dallas nor Indianapolis have ever hosted a Super Bowl.

Both remaining cities, of course, have pros and cons. Both will also have new football stadiums before 2011.

Most of what I have heard and read seemed to indicate that Indianapolis is better prepared to host the actual event itself. Being a regular host of the Final Four, and holding the Indianapolis 500 (which is far and away highest attended single day sporting event in America every year,) the city has a lot of experience on it's side.

On the other hand, Dallas' new stadium will have ~20,000 more seats than Indy's (financially this may not be a concern to the NFL owners as Indianapolis is said to be kicking in $25 million cash to compensate for the lower ticket sales expected to have a face value of $900.) Weather is also an advantage for Dallas. The odds for warm weather for a Indianapolis Super Bowl are slim to none, while in Dallas it's about 50/50.

So the decision went to Dallas. What do you think? Was this the correct decision? Where would you like to see the Super Bowl?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2007, 01:25 AM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: 2011 Super Bowl location

This definitely should have gone to Indy.

The stadium currently being built in Indianapolis is the culmination of years of negotiations and was once considered a long shot to get built at all. Giving the superbowl to Indy would have sent a message that the NFL would reward the public financing of the stadium and would have helped other teams get stadiums built in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2007, 03:35 PM
VarlosZ VarlosZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,694
Default Re: 2011 Super Bowl location

[ QUOTE ]
Giving the superbowl to Indy would have sent a message that the NFL would reward the public financing of the stadium and would have helped other teams get stadiums built in the future.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, but on the other hand, giving the superbowl to Indy would have sent a message that the NFL will reward the public financing of stadiums and would have helped other teams get stadiums built in the future.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.