NL100 Resqueezing

[matv]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
We are raising because we feel we are ahead

[/ QUOTE ]

Then it's for value...

[ QUOTE ]
and think a stand needs to be made

[/ QUOTE ]

This just doesn't really mean anything either.

[/ QUOTE ]

We're raising for protection because we think we are ahead. This player probably isn't calling us with a wide enough range that we are ahead of to make it "value".

[Lordy]

AQ being ahead of his squeezing range doesn't mean that the 4-bet is for value. It just means that he's going to fold a lot. I think I have about 25% equity against his shoving range (QQ+/AK).

I'm mainly interrested in knowing if this type of move is ok occasionally (I'm folding AQo most of the time here), if AQo is a good hand to do it compared to something like 87s, and if 4-betting is better or worse than just shoving.

[Sweir]

[ QUOTE ]
if AQo is a good hand to do it compared to something like 87s

[/ QUOTE ]

Well AQ reduces the combinations of AK/AA/QQ that he can have, and if villain calls it is a decent hand and will flop TP or better a decent % of the time.

[johnnyrocket]

you don't need to shove, raising to 48 looks stronger here than a shove, we are obviously needing to call a push tho with how committed we are, this play must be player dependent so if u have a strong read i like it.

[Grunch]

I dont like re-squeezing or 4betting with AQ. I save that for AK and 87s type hands.