Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2007, 09:57 PM
rockusteady rockusteady is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Edinburrrgghh!!!
Posts: 319
Default 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

villain hasn't been that out of hand. standard pf raises and standard cbets. that sort of thing.

fish limps. villain raises to 2.5 from BTN, Hero (BB) raises to 7.5 with AQ of spades. fish folds, villain calls.

Ks 9c 5h
Hero bets 9, villain calls.
4 s.

pot is 34ish, Hero has 50 behind and villain covers.

hero??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2007, 10:11 PM
Waingro Waingro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

I think you are smoked. I donīt see what hands he calls the flop with and folds to a second barrel, unless you have some serious metagame going on. Check and hope he bets something small. Sucks but there you have it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2007, 10:34 PM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 10,810
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

Do you think he'll smell a blocking bet for what it is and raise you with a relatively wide range? I have to agree that I don't know what he's going to check behind here. Maybe AK wanting to control pot size and not being worried about the backdoor draw? Other than that, once he calls the flop, he's hit and I don't see him passing up on value from your QQ or whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2007, 11:06 PM
rockusteady rockusteady is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Edinburrrgghh!!!
Posts: 319
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

with stack sizes- any play is awkward, i think.

if we both had 70+ i would probably c/r AI and feel pretty comfortable about it.

does anyone else feel like c/f is just too weak?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2007, 11:10 PM
cooker3 cooker3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 708
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

check call or check fold depending on bet size
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2007, 11:11 PM
rockusteady rockusteady is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Edinburrrgghh!!!
Posts: 319
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

[ QUOTE ]
I think you are smoked. I donīt see what hands he calls the flop with and folds to a second barrel.

[/ QUOTE ]

QQ, JJ, TT, and (maybe) KQ-K10.

and i think these are a big part of his range
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-20-2007, 12:49 AM
robert jordan robert jordan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: philly
Posts: 506
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

[ QUOTE ]
with stack sizes- any play is awkward, i think.

if we both had 70+ i would probably c/r AI and feel pretty comfortable about it.

does anyone else feel like c/f is just too weak?


[/ QUOTE ]


well.. you have a ~1/5 chance of hittin your hand.. so how often you think you can get value from this? Its alluring to try to draw to that nut flush.. but might turn out being -ev if he looks you up too much here.



EDIT:

I didn't take into consideration the other A being a possible out.. so best case would be 12/47= 1/4 instead of 9/47..

Makes it a little more juicy to act on.. but still might be -ev
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-20-2007, 01:57 AM
rockusteady rockusteady is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Edinburrrgghh!!!
Posts: 319
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

robert- obv if we get called a high % of the time, this play is pretty terrible.

but I would like to hear discussion on villain's range. A turn pot size bet (or shove) looks very strong and the value from its FE is pretty high, IMO.

any body like shoving the turn instead of potting it?

the better the player is the more likely I am to bet here. But I havent had a ton of experience at 50 nl (in a while) so maybe this kind of move isn't as profitable as it could be higher up.

For the record, I'm not married to the idea of betting this turn. In the actual hand I checked and got to see a free river.

But I'd still like to hear discussion on the merits of both betting and checking because I don't think its a clear cut case either way.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-20-2007, 02:32 AM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

Problem is, its a K high flop. Not A, Q or J, but K high.

What it means is there are two basic scenarios:

a) The player is a fish and calling you with KJ regardless, so the turn push / pot bet is a spew, however you can easily get away with a block bet.

b) The player is solid, in which case his preflop range to cold calling a 3bet is very tight. Given the texture of the flop, good SCs are out of his range. He also probably realizes that the flop is good for most of your holdings, and unless there was an extensive history of light 3betting between you two or at least an ace on the flop, it is less likely he is trying to float you with a worse hand here. So I wouldnt be surprised to know you have less than 9 outs here and 0 FE.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-20-2007, 07:13 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: 50 NL- turned NFD in RR pot

Check fold, or check call a bet which offers you the right odds to draw to the flush (4:1 ish)

You have no FE and your hand is bust.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.