#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com SB ($496.62) BB ($231.32) UTG ($210.30) MP ($314.98) Hero ($364) Preflop: Hero is Button with A, Q. 2 folds, Hero raises to $8, SB raises to $32, 1 fold, Hero raises to $80, SB calls $464.62 (All-In), Hero calls $284 (All-In). Flop: ($862.62) 7, 7, 2 (2 players, 2 all-in) Turn: ($862.62) 7 (2 players, 2 all-in) River: ($862.62) K (2 players, 2 all-in) Final Pot: $862.62 Results below: SB has 3s 6h (three of a kind, sevens). Hero has As Qs (three of a kind, sevens). Outcome: Hero wins $730. SB wins $132.62. END OF DEBATE [/ QUOTE ] y do you keep posting this hand out of context? [/ QUOTE ] I wasnt aware ONCE= KEEP posting interesting theory tho [/ QUOTE ] it's not your hand, http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...age=0&vc=1 [/ QUOTE ] rofl, who posts OTHERS hands...oh man...hahaha [/ QUOTE ] POKERSTARS GAME #7469740355: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($5/$10) - 2006/12/16 - 15:19:51 (ET) Table 'Peneleos' 6-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 4: Dalmations ($597 in chips) Seat 5: Lukieplaya ($4614 in chips) Seat 6: gambler2k4 ($995 in chips) Lukieplaya: posts small blind $5 gambler2k4: posts big blind $10 __2cb__: sits out *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Lukieplaya [4d As] Dalmations: folds Lukieplaya: raises $30 to $40 gambler2k4: raises $100 to $140 Longhorne joins the table at seat #2 Lukieplaya: raises $4474 to $4614 and is all-in gambler2k4: calls $855 and is all-in *** FLOP *** [8h 2d 3h] *** TURN *** [8h 2d 3h] [6d] *** RIVER *** [8h 2d 3h 6d] [2h] *** SHOW DOWN *** Lukieplaya: shows [4d As] (a pair of Deuces) gambler2k4: mucks hand Lukieplaya collected $1989 from pot |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
it's not that soft now. i've gone on to play 5/10 or 3/6 recently and there isn't a non-regular in sight. now some of the regs are less than stellar, but that's like everywhere.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
I dont have party god dammit!!!
ALSO: [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com SB ($496.62) BB ($231.32) UTG ($210.30) MP ($314.98) Hero ($364) Preflop: Hero is Button with A, Q. 2 folds, Hero raises to $8, SB raises to $32, 1 fold, Hero raises to $80, SB calls $464.62 (All-In), Hero calls $284 (All-In). Flop: ($862.62) 7, 7, 2 (2 players, 2 all-in) Turn: ($862.62) 7 (2 players, 2 all-in) River: ($862.62) K (2 players, 2 all-in) Final Pot: $862.62 Results below: SB has 3s 6h (three of a kind, sevens). Hero has As Qs (three of a kind, sevens). Outcome: Hero wins $730. SB wins $132.62. END OF DEBATE [/ QUOTE ] y do you keep posting this hand out of context? [/ QUOTE ] I wasnt aware ONCE= KEEP posting interesting theory tho [/ QUOTE ] it's not your hand, http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...age=0&vc=1 [/ QUOTE ] rofl, who posts OTHERS hands...oh man...hahaha [/ QUOTE ] POKERSTARS GAME #7469740355: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($5/$10) - 2006/12/16 - 15:19:51 (ET) Table 'Peneleos' 6-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 4: Dalmations ($597 in chips) Seat 5: Lukieplaya ($4614 in chips) Seat 6: gambler2k4 ($995 in chips) Lukieplaya: posts small blind $5 gambler2k4: posts big blind $10 __2cb__: sits out *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Lukieplaya [4d As] Dalmations: folds Lukieplaya: raises $30 to $40 gambler2k4: raises $100 to $140 Longhorne joins the table at seat #2 Lukieplaya: raises $4474 to $4614 and is all-in gambler2k4: calls $855 and is all-in *** FLOP *** [8h 2d 3h] *** TURN *** [8h 2d 3h] [6d] *** RIVER *** [8h 2d 3h 6d] [2h] *** SHOW DOWN *** Lukieplaya: shows [4d As] (a pair of Deuces) gambler2k4: mucks hand Lukieplaya collected $1989 from pot [/ QUOTE ] LOL |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
it's just a great excuse for losers at other sites
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
[ QUOTE ]
No, stay on Stars/FT. [/ QUOTE ] You seem to think that we are all gonna suddenly rush over to Party if you say that it is softer than stars/FT |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
[ QUOTE ]
it's just a great excuse for losers at other sites [/ QUOTE ] bingo |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
Party $200NL+ sucks compared to a year ago. O8 still kicks arse though, stupid euros. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
Its not as easy as they say it is..
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
what's the average vpip at party 1/2 NL ?
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is Party really THAT soft?
[ QUOTE ]
what's the average vpip at party 1/2 NL ? [/ QUOTE ] I usually play 8 tables with 28+ |
|
|