#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL200: 99 bottom set against passive villain
Villain is 20/4/2.0 but seems pretty passive.
<u>SB: $230.90</u> <u>Hero (BB): $208.40</u> <font color="black">UTG: $120.55</font> UTG+1: $198.00 MP1: $199.10 <font color="black">MP2: $168.50</font> CO: $236.00 BTN: $292.35 <font color="black">Preflop:</font> Hero is dealt 9 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (8 Players) UTG calls $2.00, 2 folds, MP2 calls $2.00, 2 folds, SB calls $1.00, Hero checks <font color="black">Flop:</font> ($8) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9 Q (4 Players) <font color="red">SB bets $6.00</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $22.00</font>, 2 folds, <font color="red">SB raises to $84.00</font>, Hero...? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: 99 bottom set against passive villain
There are way to many 2 pair/ combo draws villian could have to really think of laying this down. You might could make some sort of argument for waiting to put it in on the turn, but I def. just stick it in on the flop.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: 99 bottom set against passive villain
What if I had a read that he wouldn't push combo draws?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: 99 bottom set against passive villain
If his range is just made straights and QJ then you have have around 45% equity.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200: 99 bottom set against passive villain
He may have higher sets as well I think.
|
|
|