Interesting hand, 2/4

[J. Sawyer]

i don't think betting the flop there is standard by any means.

I think it's played fine.

[David1234]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how is this hand remotely interesting?

[/ QUOTE ]

A common situation with a number of ways for stuff to go wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]
but nothing did?

[ArturiusX]

results orientated [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[larrondo]

I'm not sure about the bet on the river. What worse hands call? What better hands fold? Maybe I'm too much of a wimp, but I probably check behind.

[Riverrun]

i dont mind checking the flop here since you avoid a c/r or raise behind you and i like the river bet against this villian since we might get a call from QJ/JT/87 type hands. possibly it'll induce a c/r bluff too since it's smallish, and i think it'd be safe to call c/r from this villian since if he flopped the flush you'd've expected him to act stronger with 2 villians behind him.

[Flatlanman3]

It woudl be intersting if he check raises you on river

[JKratzer]

raise turn

[Geir74]

[ QUOTE ]
raise turn


[/ QUOTE ]

I agree we most likely have the best hand.

UTGs flopcheck doesn't make much sense if he is stronger than KJ. But if he is bad, a slowplayed nut-flush is always a possibility.

The aggro button could come over the top and push with a combo/flushdraw if we raised turn.

Whats our plan if UTG/BU call or pushes after a turn raise?

[David1234]

[ QUOTE ]
results orientated [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
yes i am extremely results oriented i dont know how else to play

[Indiana]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure about the bet on the river. What worse hands call? What better hands fold? Maybe I'm too much of a wimp, but I probably check behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed. anybody got a good reason not to just check behind on river?