5400 SM sats

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
suzzer its a clear fold. didnt u say you made a sngpt mod for the payout so cant u just check it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah it's hard to make it look good. Anyone with over a 2k stack or close is usually going to be pretty tight. But not tight enough. Fortunately poker is easy:

suzzer99: raises 1635 to 1835 and is all-in
Boricua8: folds
straate: folds
Amigo: folds
delta: folds
cjr1010: calls 1156 and is all-in
dormammu1: folds
*** FLOP *** [2s 8c 9d]
*** TURN *** [2s 8c 9d] [8d]
*** RIVER *** [2s 8c 9d 8d] [6h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
cjr1010: shows [Tc Td] (two pair, Tens and Eights)
suzzer99: shows [6s 6c] (a full house, Sixes full of Eights)
suzzer99 collected 2887 from pot

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ok i have 15 ITMs and 20 OOTMs. thats 42.85% compared to ave of 40%. meh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Still better return than $1500 Supernova bonuses, though it does ratchet up the variance a bit. Anyone else with a better sample size? Is 45-50% ITM reasonable long-term?

[/ QUOTE ]

I have 69 cashes in 150 played for 46%. I was over 50% at one time, but have ran fairly cold lately.

Rvg, check SNG : Satellite : FPP. Oh yeah, please start playing these and add them to TM. Love ya!

[suzzer99]

My SNG structure file. Although sometimes it hangs parsing. You can massage the HH or enter the hand manually. Btw you can do MTT final tables like this too. It's pretty cool.


Filename: Pokerstars 5400_FPP_sat.str.txt

Contents:

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>
Name: PokerStars SnG 10-man sat (4-pay)
Players: 10
Buy-In: 100/5
Chips: 1500
Payouts: .25 .25 .25 .25
Blinds: 10/20 15/30 25/50 50/100 75/150 100/200 100/200/25 200/400/25
300/600/50 400/800/50 600/1200/75 1000/2000/100 1500/3000/150 2000/4000/200
3000/6000/300

FileSignature: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT
FileSignature: Hold'em No Limit
</pre><hr />

Here's a 6-max and an 18-man too. Don't ever say I didn't give something back. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Filename: Pokerstars 6-max.str.txt

Contents:

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre> Name: PokerStars SnG 6-max
Players: 6
Buy-In: 35/3 11/9 112/9
Chips: 1500
Payouts: .65 .35
Blinds: 10/20 15/30 25/50 50/100 75/150 100/200 100/200/25 200/400/25
300/600/50 400/800/50 600/1200/75 1000/2000/100 1500/3000/150 2000/4000/200
3000/6000/300

FileSignature: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT
FileSignature: Hold'em No Limit
</pre><hr />

Filename: Pokerstars 18-man.str.txt
Contents:

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre> Name: PokerStars SnG 18-man
Players: 10
Buy-In: 55/5 100/9 210/15
Chips: 1500
Payouts: .4 .3 .2 .1
Blinds: 10/20 15/30 25/50 50/100 75/150 100/200 100/200/25 200/400/25
300/600/50 400/800/50 600/1200/75 1000/2000/100 1500/3000/150 2000/4000/200
3000/6000/300

FileSignature: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT
FileSignature: Hold'em No Limit
</pre><hr />

[Austiger]

[ QUOTE ]
What exactly are these 5400 SM satalits ?

[/ QUOTE ]

[misclick odds]

5400 FPP sunday million satellites. 10 entrants, 4 get seats. at the very bottom of the SnG list

[SwimStrong]

Thanks.

[Kevin8423]

I've only played a few of these so far, but since an average ITM% for 9 person sngs is around 40%, I would think that 4 ITM seats should make this much higher. I would think 50% would be attainable even with the 10th player added. Not to mention if you play these things at the right times they play as bad or worse than the 6.50s.

[sence25]

what are the right times? :]

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
what are the right times? :]

[/ QUOTE ]

Sun. morning with people who are actually trying to win a seat to the sunday mil, and not just regulars burning off FPPs.

[sence25]

OK, so this will be my sunday afternoon program in some time.