#361
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
Another name of a character that is taken from real life.
"Richard Alpert" aka "Ram Dass" was the other professor that did all the experimentation with Tim Leary at harvard with LSD and then went on to became immersed in Indian Spirituality after that. Probably nothing more then where the writers heads were at with all the Dharma iniative and all the spiritual stuff that comes from, but just something I noticed when I found his last name was Alpert on the site with the new images. |
#362
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
[ QUOTE ]
wtf itunes still doesnt have it available yet. im not the only one right? [/ QUOTE ] why not watch for free on abc.com? |
#363
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
[ QUOTE ]
The thing that bothered me the most is that Locke didn't try to feel if there was an invisible guy there. If someone told me there was an invisible dude sitting in a chair, the first thing I would do would be to swipe at him with my arms and see if I connect with anything. If I couldn't touch him at least I'd probably piss him off a little. [/ QUOTE ] Or kick the chair when I got pissed. Yeah I thought this was lame as well, but forgot to put it in my post. In response to a couple of other general posts, as I said before, I love Lost. I've loved this season to death, because I'm getting the answers slowly but surely, which is cool. What is frustrating is when they open up new questions before they finish off some of the old ones. What is more frustrating is when some of those new questions seem to make no sense whatsoever (i.e. Jacob). I have plenty of patience. I was watching each episode when everyone else was yelling "They better get moving or I quit." I just don't like some of the directions they are moving. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Ray |
#364
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
i guess i'm kind of an idiot, but where was the '4-toed statue' in this episode everyone is talking about?
|
#365
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
[ QUOTE ]
i guess i'm kind of an idiot, but where was the '4-toed statue' in this episode everyone is talking about? [/ QUOTE ] ben's birthday present from annie LDO |
#366
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
[ QUOTE ]
Comment from the producers in white:... [/ QUOTE ] <font color="white"> I was unaware of that. Well, in that case, Adam and Eve are Desmond and Penny. gg Lost [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] </font> |
#367
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
[ QUOTE ]
i guess i'm kind of an idiot, but where was the '4-toed statue' in this episode everyone is talking about? [/ QUOTE ] lol. [ QUOTE ] ben's birthday present from annie LDO [/ QUOTE ] nice throw! |
#368
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Comment from the producers in white:... [/ QUOTE ] <font color="white">I was unaware of that. Well, in that case, Adam and Eve are Desmond and Penny. gg Lost [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]</font> [/ QUOTE ] in white, please |
#369
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
[ QUOTE ]
Spoiler: <font color="white"> Locke is not dead because the season 3 finale preview mentions him having an altercation with Jack </font> [/ QUOTE ] Just a funny thought regarding this spoiler. Knowing how Lost works lately, even if Locke were dead, this is still entirely possible. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Ray |
#370
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL*** LOST Season 3 Episode 20 Discussion -spoiler free-
OK, I think the spoilers are getting a little out of control. If you make a spoiler in white, you can't talk about the spoiler in regular text either or it defeats the purpose. So you end up with a bunch of white posts - so why not just keep with the thread title and make it "spoiler-free"?
|
|
|