16$ 88-20BB at the 50/100 level

[malnek]

i hate raising in this spot esp with your stack so i probably fold

[Schmitty 87]

How do you guys do overall at 50/100? I'm a loser at both 50/100 and 100/200. Big winner at 25/50, 75/150, and 200/400. I don't have a huge sample size, but it seems reasonable. I'm down with all my low pairs at 50/100. I think I'd usually limp 88 here, so maybe that isn't the best idea.

[Kevin8423]

[ QUOTE ]
How do you guys do overall at 50/100? I'm a loser at both 50/100 and 100/200. Big winner at 25/50, 75/150, and 200/400. I don't have a huge sample size, but it seems reasonable. I'm down with all my low pairs at 50/100. I think I'd usually limp 88 here, so maybe that isn't the best idea.

[/ QUOTE ]

Over a big sample size you should be winning at all levels, limping PPs would definitley contribute to losing at this level.

[AggJedi]

Why is folding recomended here, is raising terrible?

[Kevin8423]

IMO folding>raising>>>limping. I don't like playing the hand because of the limper, but limping yourself is just asking to get shoved over.

[Schmitty 87]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you guys do overall at 50/100? I'm a loser at both 50/100 and 100/200. Big winner at 25/50, 75/150, and 200/400. I don't have a huge sample size, but it seems reasonable. I'm down with all my low pairs at 50/100. I think I'd usually limp 88 here, so maybe that isn't the best idea.

[/ QUOTE ]

Over a big sample size you should be winning at all levels, limping PPs would definitley contribute to losing at this level.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you sure about that? It seems to me like 50/100 will be a level at which we are passing up on a bunch of +cEV spots because we feel them to be -$EV. Maybe not so much at 100/200 but I'm not sure.

I also just realized that I have all my mtt and hu sng stats in the same database, and since I've never imported tournament histories, they're all mixed together. That could be causing the problem I suppose. Anyone know how to sort it after the fact?