|
|
#11
05-08-2007, 01:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I hate weak overpairs out of position . . .
3-bet pf and the rest is standard imo.
|
|
#12
05-08-2007, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate weak overpairs out of position . . .
Oh my appologies all... I originally thought it was 9 players to the flop. SORRY!!... Call down probably in order.
|
|
#13
05-08-2007, 03:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I hate weak overpairs out of position . . .
Okay. What am I missing? Why are you not betting your vulnerable overpair on the turn? It is very likely both your opponents have nothing but overcards. Why give them a free card?
|
|
#14
05-08-2007, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Results
[ QUOTE ]
oh hey FullyTilted.... What ended up happening in the hand? [/ QUOTE ] River was a 9, making all right with the world. Villain had KK and was not a happy camper. The term "paying off like a slot machine" was used . . . In retrospect I should have 3 bet pf, no question. Also in retrospect, I shouldn't have worried overmuch about the BB, who seemed like he was on a draw (possibly TP with or without a draw) after calling two cold. While I don't want BB to get a free turn card, I would hate to be raised by LP if he has a hand. I'd have to let it go at that point. Is bet-fold a better turn option than check-call? It seems unlikely that villain would raise the turn against two players with only a draw, and much less likely with just overs.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
