Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:46 PM
SuitedSixes SuitedSixes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Buy shrits!
Posts: 4,810
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone break down the logic of the push here with that junk?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not really all that junky. A suited one-gapped connector is a helluva lot better than a dominated A or K. I have a new mantra, "You gotta give yourself a chance to suck-out."
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:51 PM
SeanyBullets SeanyBullets is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 65
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone break down the logic of the push here with that junk?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not really all that junky. A suited one-gapped connector is a helluva lot better than a dominated A or K. I have a new mantra, "You gotta give yourself a chance to suck-out."

[/ QUOTE ]

Best. Advice. Ever [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-08-2007, 08:55 AM
GotQuads GotQuads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 181
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

Here's a chance to make a big mistake by using Sng-PT, but not your brain.

Sng-PT does NOT(!) factor in the blinds next hand, it's just an ICM calculator for the hand you were just dealt that's all. This makes SNG-PT basically worthless in this particular scenario, and most likely shoving is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-08-2007, 10:16 AM
TEKEE TEKEE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: somewhere in time
Posts: 257
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

i like the push in this spot id do the same if i were in your shoes.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-08-2007, 06:22 PM
Bubblefish Bubblefish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 127
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

I have tried to quantify the effect off the big blind hitting Hero in the next hand. If we assume everyone folds if we folds in the original hand, we get in this situation:
UTG 1870
CO 3490
Btn 3615
SB 2975
Hero 1550

Assuming all players play by the equilibrium ranges I have calculated Heros EV after each of the 25 possible outcomes of this hand, and weighted them with the chances of each outcome. My calculations shows that Heros equity after this hand (as BB) is 11,13 %. This is indeed far away from the 13 % fold Equity suggested by SNGPT in the original hand.


Even if my presumptions are somewhat off, I think this indicates that Hero can make a larger –EV push then -1,5 %.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-08-2007, 07:29 PM
Jshuttlesworth Jshuttlesworth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,688
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
I have tried to quantify the effect off the big blind hitting Hero in the next hand. If we assume everyone folds if we folds in the original hand, we get in this situation:
UTG 1870
CO 3490
Btn 3615
SB 2975
Hero 1550

Assuming all players play by the equilibrium ranges I have calculated Heros EV after each of the 25 possible outcomes of this hand, and weighted them with the chances of each outcome. My calculations shows that Heros equity after this hand (as BB) is 11,13 %. This is indeed far away from the 13 % fold Equity suggested by SNGPT in the original hand.


Even if my presumptions are somewhat off, I think this indicates that Hero can make a larger –EV push then -1,5 %.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, nice. thank you very much
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-08-2007, 08:24 PM
Slim Pickens Slim Pickens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: John Wayne\'s not dead.
Posts: 5,574
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

Very nice, but I have a problem with the statement "I think this indicates that Hero can make a larger –EV push then -1,5 %." What is the $EV of the next (BB) hand after the two possible outcomes of pushing? Is it different than 11.13%?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-09-2007, 02:31 AM
Bubblefish Bubblefish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 127
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

I have not calculated the EV after Hero push. It will be too much of a job. There are 6 different outcomes after a Hero push. Each outcome results in 25 possible new situations to be evaluated. Even thou it is not correct to ignore the effect of the hitting of BB after a push I think it is much less affected than the position after Hero folds. If Hero loose he will have 0 chips, and the EV should be correctly calculated by SNGPT [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] If Hero push and wins he will have double the amount of chips, and be much less influenced by the hitting of the large BB. The biggest difference in Equity is when everyone folds to Heros push. Maybe I should calculate this equity… I might do it…
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-09-2007, 04:08 AM
JROK777 JROK777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: huffin nitromethane
Posts: 736
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

This is an auto any two card shove for me, because the next hand will be an auto any two card call for me, so let's take advantage of any FE we might have (which is bolstered by the fact that we are pushing from UTG, even though many of us will assign a wider range to a SS UTG shover, many of the horrible players we see don't).

The "desperado" UTG shove, top secret standard play!
In the next hand we will have 3 BB's. Any decent player will push ATC out of the SB into us. We have to call this shove with any 2 cards geting huge odds on the $.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:19 AM
GotQuads GotQuads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 181
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

What 6 different outcomes do you mean? If Hero pushes there's a lot more possible outcomes, especially if we consider multiway all-ins.

Overall I think by not pushing we give up so much $EV by getting hit by the BB that I fully agree with your analysis that -1% is not a problem at all.

BTW: SNGPT does not say it's an obvious fold. It's very close anyways. Not sure what ranges were assumed by OP? Certainly only the blinds are going to call with a wide range, but not the other players
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.