Help Me Badger Stars into HU Cash Games, PT 2

[emerson]

[ QUOTE ]
Hello Daniel,

Thank you for your email. We base all of the games we offer on the demand
from our players. If enough players request a certain game we will add it
to the schedule.

I will forward your suggestion on to our management team for their further
review. If there are many other requests for these games, you may see it
added!

Let us know if we can assist you further.

Regards,

Dan C
PokerStars Support Team

[/ QUOTE ]

A tough battle. The collusion teams likely make up a good portion of their customer base and would oppose something like this, which would cut into their business.

[kahntrutahn]

[ QUOTE ]
The collusion teams likely make up a good portion of their customer base

[/ QUOTE ]



This I gotta hear... Information please? PM if you wish.

[emerson]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The collusion teams likely make up a good portion of their customer base

[/ QUOTE ]



This I gotta hear... Information please? PM if you wish.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no information. This is speculation, but speculation I have a high degree of confidence in. People who were online winners for several years, when there were lots of fish, can no longer win. They are now writing books and such, something that a profitable multi-tabler would not have time to do. There are not a sufficient number of fish to offset the cheaters. Even the best players can no longer win if they are not part of a collusion group, at least not at the higher levels.

The strongest players, the honest ones who don't cheat, have figured this out and will only play heads up. The cheaters likely have some sort of pull at sites that don't offer heads up play. Why would they not? The games move so fast that the site must make a ton in rake from heads up tables. I think people who have lots of influence make money off of collusion teams.

[vmacosta]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The collusion teams likely make up a good portion of their customer base

[/ QUOTE ]



This I gotta hear... Information please? PM if you wish.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no information. This is speculation, but speculation I have a high degree of confidence in. People who were online winners for several years, when there were lots of fish, can no longer win. They are now writing books and such, something that a profitable multi-tabler would not have time to do. There are not a sufficient number of fish to offset the cheaters. Even the best players can no longer win if they are not part of a collusion group, at least not at the higher levels.

The strongest players, the honest ones who don't cheat, have figured this out and will only play heads up. The cheaters likely have some sort of pull at sites that don't offer heads up play. Why would they not? The games move so fast that the site must make a ton in rake from heads up tables. I think people who have lots of influence make money off of collusion teams.

[/ QUOTE ]

woah, emerson, that is some seriously paranoid [censored].

[emerson]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The collusion teams likely make up a good portion of their customer base

[/ QUOTE ]



This I gotta hear... Information please? PM if you wish.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no information. This is speculation, but speculation I have a high degree of confidence in. People who were online winners for several years, when there were lots of fish, can no longer win. They are now writing books and such, something that a profitable multi-tabler would not have time to do. There are not a sufficient number of fish to offset the cheaters. Even the best players can no longer win if they are not part of a collusion group, at least not at the higher levels.

The strongest players, the honest ones who don't cheat, have figured this out and will only play heads up. The cheaters likely have some sort of pull at sites that don't offer heads up play. Why would they not? The games move so fast that the site must make a ton in rake from heads up tables. I think people who have lots of influence make money off of collusion teams.

[/ QUOTE ]

woah, emerson, that is some seriously paranoid [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

hey, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. Do you know any non-colluding higher stakes players that are winning over the last 6 months (other than heads up)?

[The Bryce]

[ QUOTE ]
hey, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. Do you know any non-colluding higher stakes players that are winning over the last 6 months (other than heads up)?

[/ QUOTE ]

The real question is, will Schneider's elite collusion tactics be included in his upcoming cardrunners videos? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[bicyclekick]

yeah I know one: schneider.

I can't dream of winning. I suck though. So I play NL hehe.

[Cardsofwood]

[ QUOTE ]
sent

[/ QUOTE ]