Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:05 PM
bilbo-san bilbo-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In ur game, pickin off ur bluffz
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

[ QUOTE ]
150-160...just under a pot sized raise. We called the 3 bet for set value so lets get it,..i'm paying off KK/TT here even Ldonnie..if he calls and the turn is the Tc...well maybe I'm too pessimistic...

[/ QUOTE ]

We didn't call for set value alone, unless I don't know Orange as well as I think. In any case if you were playing 99 here purely for set value against a decent player that would be pretty bad poker.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:07 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

playing for pure set value is meh, but given this specific situation (stacks/position), i think i can make a move once in a while for it to be profitable.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:12 PM
drewvy drewvy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 543
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

so....he's planning on making a play at a scary board then if he missed in a reraised pot with a history of a 5bet shove A6s???
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:41 PM
bilbo-san bilbo-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In ur game, pickin off ur bluffz
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

[ QUOTE ]
playing for pure set value is meh, but given this specific situation (stacks/position), i think i can make a move once in a while for it to be profitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol.

I meant that you should win at show-down unimproved sometimes... He's 3-betting a pretty wide range this deep, I assume, since you're 4-betting A6.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:49 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

[ QUOTE ]
I assume, since you're 5 -betting A6.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 05-03-2007, 10:34 PM
_Jager_ _Jager_ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 16
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

Ldonnie can get somewhat spewy especially in 3bet pots, here is a hand with him today.

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $1/$2 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)

SB: $116
BB: $48
UTG: $273.65
CO: $367.60
<font color="black">Hero (BTN): $198.30</font>

<font color="black">Preflop:</font> Hero is dealt K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players)
UTG folds, <font color="red">CO raises to $8</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $28</font>, 2 folds, <font color="red">CO raises all-in to $367.60</font>, Hero calls all-in for $170.30
Uncalled bet of $169.30 returned to CO

<font color="black">Flop:</font> ($399.60) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 2 All-In)

<font color="black">Turn:</font> ($399.60) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players - 2 All-In)

<font color="black">River:</font> ($399.60) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players - 2 All-In)

Pot Size: $399.60 ($2 Rake)

CO had Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (a pair of Queens) and LOST (-$198.30)
Hero had K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (a pair of Aces) and WON (+$199.30)





As played Orange I would check turn, call almost any river. He will likely put you on a draw, KQ, etc. He is more likely to bet his AK/bluff than call a shove with whatever he has.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 05-03-2007, 10:35 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

jager, if you are who i think you are, i think your a pretty solid/good player.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 05-04-2007, 09:52 AM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

Results?
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 05-04-2007, 10:21 AM
AaronOC AaronOC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 822
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

[ QUOTE ]
Results?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 05-04-2007, 10:39 AM
Clayton Clayton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 1 time
Posts: 14,710
Default Re: 99 deep vs. TAG

orange checked, and villain checkfolded a total blank river
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.