MLB (04/25/07)

[RStMartin]

[ QUOTE ]
Nationals are 1-1 against mets. You would be down $90. Only series they have been swept was a 4 gamer against d-backs.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you need a bigger sample size.

[vMario]

Florida Marlins +145 - WIN
Philadelphia Phillies -180 - WIN
Minnesota Twins -155 - LOSS
New York Mets -190 !( 2 units ) - LOSS
Boston Red Sox -133 - WIN
San Diego Padres vs. Arizona Diamondbacks Over 7.5 (-120)- LOSS
Milwaukee Brewers vs. Chicago Cubs Over 7 (+105) (2 units) - WIN

WIN 4 / LOSS 3 / PUSH 0
+0.884 units.

And NY Mets was probably overrated by me, yes.

[Macdaddy Warsaw]

Um...I don't understand how you booked a 0.884u win.

[vMario]

[ QUOTE ]
Um...I don't understand how you booked a 0.884u win.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am sorry, I don't quite understand - are you being sarcastic?

I overrated NY Mets and Minnesota lost close, 3 to 4.

[whipsaw]

He wants to see your math, by my eyeballing it I see about .5 down

[136913691369]

Florida Marlins +145 - WIN +1.45
Philadelphia Phillies -180 - WIN +1
Minnesota Twins -155 - LOSS -1.55
New York Mets -190 !( 2 units ) - LOSS -3.8
Boston Red Sox -133 - WIN +1
San Diego Padres vs. Arizona Diamondbacks Over 7.5 (-120)- LOSS -1.20
Milwaukee Brewers vs. Chicago Cubs Over 7 (+105) (2 units) - WIN +2.10

that's -1 unit, assuming risk x units to win y units on dogs and risking y units to win x units on faves.

[New001]

Why assume that though? The math checks out if each bet is 1u or 2u risked.

[vMario]

Risk $25 to win $18.80 WIN
Risk $25 to win $13.90 WIN
Risk $25 to win $36.30 WIN
Risk $50 to win $52.60 WIN
Risk $50 to win $26.40 LOSS
Risk $25 to win $20.80 LOSS
Risk $25 to win $16.10 LOSS

+121.60$
-100$

1u = $25

121.60 - 100 = 21.60
21.60 / 25 = 0.864

Correct me, if I am wrong.

[ImNew]

That is WIN 5 / LOSS 3 / PUSH 0
not WIN 4 / LOSS 3 / PUSH 0

[vMario]

I corrected!

I made the 2 unit pick in 2 separate bets and forgot to delete one. However, the math should be fine now and +0.864u checks fine, right?