#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
So basically you have no value to add,are trying to get some free advertising on whatever that site is you post at the end of your pointless posts?? Did I miss anything?
Mods notified, hopefully they just delete this. Don't post links to your private site here. It isn't welcome. -Brendan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
[ QUOTE ]
Don't post links to your private site here. It isn't welcome. -Brendan [/ QUOTE ] I am sorry, didn't knew that - I have seen lots of people doing it. And btw, you should work on your attitude/behavior. I am trying to be polite here with you, but still you keep bitching on me - please, if you aren't interested then move on, okay? I am not trying achieve anything ( advertise or something ) - but I do think that I got some value in my bets, I am not going to explain the 'method' or however to call it, the way how I pick. But seriously, I don't know how to say it in nice way, just get out of my thread. And by the way, my picks been quite successful in NBA, so I am not just a random guy around. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
I actually think that it's fair for people to say whatever they want on an internet forum (stupid or not, people are not guilty because of that, sometimes it's funny though).
I don't know who is right but most likely neither of you will gain money arguing about that. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
I wonder where the 20 mph winds are going to keep cubs game from hitting over? Only question is whether score will be double the over. I live in chicago I'd like to know where these 20mph winds are? Calm winds currently.
I love how many people are so fast to blast picks. not too fast to come back when blasting was wrong by a lot. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
The mets -190 pick didn't work out that well.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
I think I've learned from following this site this MLB season so far is that picking winners is not much more than a coin toss. Finding value is where the skill lies.
I had great success over NBA and NHL season and am having difficult time adjusting to MLB, but am catching on quick. For example...Mets -190 is wrong regardless of who is playing since Mets will not win against any team consistantly short of my sons tee-ball team enough to have value long term. (plus bad starting pitcher going for mets) Dallas Mavs -190 at home against any NBA team would be a steal. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
You obviously see a far wider range of odds in the NBA- for example Dallas is -600 tonight at home against GS- but I don't see how you can conclude from that point that it is never correct to lay -190 in baseball. The Mets game tonight was a bad bet because the Rockies are a better team than the odds dictate, even with Josh Fogg on the hill, but not because the Mets are NEVER a -190 favorite.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
I personally feel that right now there is no MLB team that the Mets are that big of a favorite against. If you can name 1 team the the mets will consistantly win better than 2/3rds of their games against? If they win 2 out of 3 at 190 to win 100, you win $10 if my math is correct.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
Washington Nationals
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB (04/25/07)
Nationals are 1-1 against mets. You would be down $90. Only series they have been swept was a 4 gamer against d-backs.
|
|
|