#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would more blinds make for better games?
a mandatory straddle game would be most excellent.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would more blinds make for better games?
I like the idea about less multi-tablers. I think this would loosen up the games quite a bit. Say, max 2 or 3 tables?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would more blinds make for better games?
I think they should offer some rooms that are for single tablers only. Would be interesting to see the demand and play in them.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would more blinds make for better games?
Thinking further on this why not offer two options? Certain tables (Maybe 20%) could be marked as being single table only - e,g; you could only play on the one table, if you chose to sit on these . The rest is an open market as it is now. The same rules could be applied across STT's and MTT's - it would be interesting to see what the results were like.
PS. I am in no way affiliated to tuff_fish [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would more blinds make for better games?
The problem with these new games is that almost no people play them, the fish tend to like hold'em therefore the good players also play hold'em.
Reducing multitabling would be great but don't see it happening, especially now with it being more difficult to move money around sites are trying harder and harder to keep the multitablers, while not going out of the way for the fish. Getting rid of HUDs is something I am all for in making the games better, I use them now but would definately be willing to give them up. I like the idea of a straddle game and love the idea of Kill games in limit, no idea why they aren't popular. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would more blinds make for better games?
[ QUOTE ]
a mandatory straddle game would be most excellent. [/ QUOTE ] I would love to see this at various stakes. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would more blinds make for better games?
PokerWorld has a straddle option. I have no idea what it does, nor what kill games are.
|
|
|