Full Tilt or Poker Stars

shymijo2love4 · #1 04-21-2007, 05:28 PM

Which is easier to win in the micro limits NLH cash games?

Jetto · #2 04-22-2007, 12:18 AM

Id SAy PS but there both Micro so competition shouldn't be too hard.

oober · #3 04-22-2007, 01:28 AM

Both games are just as beatable...

Second Toughest · #4 04-22-2007, 02:14 AM

Thanks oober, but one or the other. I'd say stars.

deflY · #5 04-22-2007, 03:50 AM

Because of the massive ammount of ads in Europe, a lot of Fish plays on Stars (and they even give them free $5).
So definately Stars.

C0n5pir4cy · #6 04-22-2007, 04:29 AM

PARTY

DWarrior · #7 04-22-2007, 02:07 PM

Take into consideration that FTP has 27% rb. That's ~1.5bb/100 at $50nl (over my 25k hand sample), so do you think Stars games are that much better to add an extra 1.5bb/100?

I know they have the FPP, but that doesn't kick in for a while, and I'm not sure it's worth anything at low stakes.

aoFrantic · #8 04-22-2007, 07:41 PM

Stars because you can play longer, due to it looking nicer.
You shouldn't have trouble beating any micro limits no matter where you go though.

fxrenegade · #9 04-22-2007, 10:19 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Stars because you can play longer, due to it looking nicer.
You shouldn't have trouble beating any micro limits no matter where you go though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fulltilt's has got nice avatars too. I like FT more than PS. And yes, the 27% rakeback. The game is definitely beatable at that level. Seems pretty similar at both sites. Plus, Fulltilt has 100% bonus up to $600. Now, that's some bad beat insurance.

PJo336 · #10 04-22-2007, 10:44 PM

Yeh but it takes 10 years to get the whole bonus at the micros. Still better just because of the rakeback. Rakeback is by far one of the most important aspects to building a roll.