#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopped set of aces... should I have bet the flop?
Shouldn't you vary your flop bet based on the number of players left to act and the composition of the board? I bet higher when there is more than one opponent, and I don't think it tells them what I have. Also, on a draw heavy board, doesn't it make sense to charge more to see a card?
In SSNL about the most my opponents seem to notice is that I see less flops than the rest of the limpers, so they eventually calm down and become capable of folding when I bet. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopped set of aces... should I have bet the flop?
[ QUOTE ]
Shouldn't you vary your flop bet based on the number of players left to act and the composition of the board? [/ QUOTE ] Betting % of the pot accomplishes this. I do not vary my c-bet on board composition. [ QUOTE ] I bet higher when there is more than one opponent, and I don't think it tells them what I have. [/ QUOTE ] If the flop is multiway, then a full pot cb will be more if the hand has 4 players vs if the hand has 2 players, so I think we agree here. [ QUOTE ] Also, on a draw heavy board, doesn't it make sense to charge more to see a card? [/ QUOTE ] A 2/3 to full pot bet prices out most draws (for immediate odds purposes). |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flopped set of aces... should I have bet the flop?
4_2_it
This brings up something that has been bothering me, and maybe needs its own thread. In SSNL games there are frequent multi-way flops (4, 5 or 6!), even after I have raised preflop. Does a c-bet make any sense at all if I haven't connected? The chance of getting 5 folds is about zero. If I have connected and board is very organized, the only way to get the callers down to managable level seems to be overbetting the flop. Yes, this is a betting pattern, but does it matter in this case? These N-way pots are frustrating. |
|
|