#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL50, overpair kings facing push
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (8 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)
CO ($73.05) Hero ($81.75) SB ($48.30) BB ($30.25) UTG ($51.55) UTG+1 ($53.55) MP1 ($18.80) MP2 ($117.45) Preflop: Hero is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP1 calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $0.50, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $3</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls $2.50, MP1 calls $2.50, CO folds. Flop: ($9.75) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> BB checks, MP1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $7.5</font>, BB calls $7.50, MP1 folds. Turn: ($24.75) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets $19.75 (All-In)</font>, Hero ...? can i get away here? should i bet more on the flop? no reads he just sat down |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, overpair kings facing push
flop is so ugly I'm tempted to say pot it, but I think your bet accomplishes the same effect
villain would have to have a low AF for me to fold here, what's your reads? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, overpair kings facing push
as far as charging draws goes, your flop bet is fine. and i'm almost never folding this.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, overpair kings facing push
bump, more comments pls
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, overpair kings facing push
that turn didn't change too much i dont think. if he was drawing to a gutshot good for him. 45 was already there on the flop. if he showsdown a hand that beats you its gonna be two pair or a set thats pushing, not a straight.
with that said i probly call. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, overpair kings facing push
Plays like 78s doesn't it..... he pushes here, why does the 8 change anything?
Weird...... I probably call here, if for nothing more than curiosity |
|
|