|
|
#11
04-13-2007, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ruling on a so called raise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] $25 chip tossed out followed by a $1 chip is a raise to $25 and the $1 comes back. [/ QUOTE ] So, the $1 comes back because it's a string raise. Wouldn't the $25 chip then be just a call using the single-chip rule? [/ QUOTE ] DANGIT! I knew I shoulda proofread that twice. Correct you are, sir. Thank you for being polite about pointing out my stupidity. 
|
|
#12
04-13-2007, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ruling on a so called raise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] $25 chip tossed out followed by a $1 chip is a raise to $25 and the $1 comes back. [/ QUOTE ] So, the $1 comes back because it's a string raise. Wouldn't the $25 chip then be just a call using the single-chip rule? [/ QUOTE ] DANGIT! I knew I shoulda proofread that twice. Correct you are, sir. Thank you for being polite about pointing out my stupidity. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Nah, I figured 1 of two things: 1) I was stupid, or 2) You didn't proofread the post twice. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
04-14-2007, 12:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ruling on a so called raise
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ...guy throws in a $25 and $1 chip without saying anything. Min. raise had to go <u>$22</u>, but he threw in 2 chips for more... [/ QUOTE ] A minor fix, just to be clear [/ QUOTE ] True, and if the guy didn't add the $1 chip to his $25 chip and didn't say anything, it would just be a call. I guess you could also throw in a $100 chip plus a $1 chip if you didn't want to say "I raise" This would be very odd.
|
|
#14
04-14-2007, 05:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ruling on a so called raise
Min raise should have been $22. Since he clearly threw in $26 with two chips it's a raise. Not sure what the controvery is there.
Al
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
