100nl TT turns boat but being min-cr

[Dr_Doctr]

Points taken - misread stack sizes - Me=Donk

[matv]

I check behind the turn. Basically I am doing this to induce a bluff from a flush dra,w and I will pretty much always get a call from a lower pocket pair if I act so weak on the turn (unless an A or possibly K falls).

[Ben86]

I dont like this, Ive always found check minraises are a good mix of the nuts and hands that are trying to find out if they are good or not. I'd 3 bet him and make a very important note if he had the nuts. (or air, or what he perceived to be a good hand)

[el_grande]

shouldn't there be some rule that if you are going to bet in position and fold to a minraise, you should just check behind?

[Unknown Soldier]

[ QUOTE ]
that are trying to find out if they are good or not.

[/ QUOTE ]

hes comitting himself though

[Ben86]

im not sure he knows hes commiting himself, also im not sure if thats a bad thing.

[Unknown Soldier]

look at his af though i know its a small sample, but he has been really passive

[Ben86]

woah.. i hear ya but 22 hands should not be taken with any confidence. i try not to look until triple digits at least

[TwistedEcho]

why does everyone want to check behind? He has a better PP like 1% of the time, a Q sometimes and a worse pair that will check call turn/river because he has a fullhouse and no-one folds them. Checking turn is dumb.

[Unknown Soldier]

[ QUOTE ]
why does everyone want to check behind? He has a better PP like 1% of the time, a Q sometimes and a worse pair that will check call turn/river because he has a fullhouse and no-one folds them. Checking turn is dumb.

[/ QUOTE ]

thank you



also, for those trying to impliment pot control; pot control in case he has what? Like he said a higher pp a v. small % of the time and a Q is v. unlikely.