Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 02-25-2007, 07:12 PM
Ruprecht Ruprecht is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 98
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

What you guys think is awesome is just chickenshit poker. Do you think that's what the game is about? Who can pull off the most small-time hustler moves ?

Do you think it is about the Matusows of poker badgering other players until they get them to make a mistake ?

Poker doesn't need this two-bit con stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 04-12-2007, 04:35 PM
Markusgc Markusgc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mildly Inconvenienced
Posts: 795
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

So - a little off topic, but anyway...

If Laak's opponent had agreed, would he have been able to take his chips back?

Something similar happened to me once, and it WAS a mistake. I wasn't allowed to take 'em back.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 04-12-2007, 05:30 PM
jaminbird jaminbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The other side of the tubes
Posts: 954
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

Good bump, Laak tried to do this to Antonio in on of the episodes of this seasons HSP. It was for a much smaller amount though.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 04-12-2007, 07:54 PM
kemystery kemystery is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: leveling you
Posts: 2,045
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

Kenna James wrote an article about a hand where he had a full house on the turn vs his opponents small flush, the player had 5K coming via chip runner but only 500 or so on the table - Kenna who at the time happened to be wearing headphones essentially motioned all in vs. the guy who then asked Kenna if he knew that he had 5K behind - Kenna said no and basically made a big production out of getting a floor decision on the bet - floor decision was that the bet stood for the full amount - guy called and lost - Kenna came with commentry like "Yeah right buddy, I'm a professional you think I don't know exactly how many chips you have?" in the article, I thought it was a sick play

but unless there is a specific rule in play - hey thatz poker
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 04-12-2007, 08:15 PM
Omniheart Omniheart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 373
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

5k chips = pink 100 chips = white same size though
Horrible if he did that. I would stab him afterwards
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 04-12-2007, 08:53 PM
ActionJeff ActionJeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: though my mind could think I still was a mad man
Posts: 1,467
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

[ QUOTE ]
This seems like a really really unethical move to me. But the guy who called if the chips were not similar deserves to be shot.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a huge angle shoot- if its true, wow what a douchebag. How can anyone say this isn't unethical? This is the kind of [censored] that people get their legs broken for....
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:50 AM
Daddy Warbucks Daddy Warbucks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Doin\' numbers like Soduku
Posts: 3,968
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

[ QUOTE ]
Kenna James wrote an article about a hand where he had a full house on the turn vs his opponents small flush, the player had 5K coming via chip runner but only 500 or so on the table - Kenna who at the time happened to be wearing headphones essentially motioned all in vs. the guy who then asked Kenna if he knew that he had 5K behind - Kenna said no and basically made a big production out of getting a floor decision on the bet - floor decision was that the bet stood for the full amount - guy called and lost - Kenna came with commentry like "Yeah right buddy, I'm a professional you think I don't know exactly how many chips you have?" in the article, I thought it was a sick play

but unless there is a specific rule in play - hey thatz poker

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, i remember reading that and thinking "did he really just write an article about angling somebody?" and then used some flimsy pretense of "you have to use every edge and constantly be creative" or something similar.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 04-13-2007, 09:55 AM
ActionFreak ActionFreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 487
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

The people that think that the scenario described by OP is just good poker..... is it also good poker to lie about how money you have in front of you in a NL game?
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 04-13-2007, 10:41 AM
thisismyback thisismyback is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 24
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

What is the difference between the Laak, James, etc stories and pretending to struggle over a reraise holding AA preflop?

This past summer at the WSOP I remember witnessing a 5/10 NL hand between Ezra (99% sure it was Ezra of cardrunners) and an older gentleman at Ceasars. Ezra raised from the button and his opponent reraised from either the SB or BB. Ezra went into the tank for a good three minutes and kind of hammed it up a little bit. He moved all in and got instacalled, hhwg. His opponent got upset and another old timer got up and started berating Ezra as well, "That was classless, blahblahblah, never have I ever blahblahblah..."

Personally, I see nothing wrong with that. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that 99/100 people are probably guilty of doing this either live or online at one time. I just don't see a difference between this circumstance and the Laak or James situations.

The losing player just got out played/hustled/smarted.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 04-13-2007, 10:43 AM
LBK LBK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 533
Default Re: 2nd hand story: Phil Laak $70k angle-shoot

[ QUOTE ]
What is the difference between the Laak, James, etc stories and pretending to struggle over a reraise holding AA preflop?

This past summer at the WSOP I remember witnessing a 5/10 NL hand between Ezra (99% sure it was Ezra of cardrunners) and an older gentleman at Ceasars. Ezra raised from the button and his opponent reraised from either the SB or BB. Ezra went into the tank for a good three minutes and kind of hammed it up a little bit. He moved all in and got instacalled, hhwg. His opponent got upset and another old timer got up and started berating Ezra as well, "That was classless, blahblahblah, never have I ever blahblahblah..."

Personally, I see nothing wrong with that. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that 99/100 people are probably guilty of doing this either live or online at one time. I just don't see a difference between this circumstance and the Laak or James situations.

The losing player just got out played/hustled/smarted.

[/ QUOTE ]


Apples and Oranges IMO.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.