#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Greg Raymer, Full Tilt Pros
[ QUOTE ]
4/8, 2.5/5, 1.5/3, .75/1.5, .4/.8 they are all 40bb min, 200bb max [/ QUOTE ] It must've recently changed because the minimum is now 100bb |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] no, re: KKF [/ QUOTE ] lol. if it's a joke, it's a stupid one. [/ QUOTE ] I looked at the party games yesterday and noticed KKF playing on 2 tables with 40 and 50bb. This was a full nl 1k 6max table. But I just took my first peak in like a month so I dunno. But thats different than 20bb. [/ QUOTE ] I've seen him doing the same lately. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF
Greg said he would email and talk to Lee about it.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF
I had a pretty long e-mail correspondance with lee jones about raising the minimum buy-ins at PLO tables and the response was to leave them the same but add 6max (which we didn't have until recently). With Lee's permission I would post his e-mails--I doubt you will see the minimum raised.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF
if stars did get deep tables no-one would play on them as it would be full of sharks, see the ones on FTP for perfect examples.. all these clowns want is to get fish deep, but fish dont like playing deep, so either play fish on shallow stacks or play pros with deep stacks.. go figure which one is more profitable.
You could of course just play better against the shortstacks and use their relative position on the table to your advantage, but that requires a thought process outside of juggling numbers in pokerHUD so you are unlikely to understand it adequately. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF
el oh el deepstackers
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF
you're just going to scare the fish away by raising the min.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF
[ QUOTE ]
you're just going to scare the fish away by raising the min. [/ QUOTE ] very true everyone concered with this issue should put more energy into getting rid of hitnrunning instead of getting rid of shortstacks |
|
|