#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Definition of a loose game in PL Omaha?
[ QUOTE ]
50bb average pot is average. [/ QUOTE ] unless youre winning, in which case its nice, yes. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Definition of a loose game in PL Omaha?
It depends on what sort of "loose" you're looking for. You can find tables which are multi-way limpfest preflop and mostly nut-peddling post-flop (where check-calling bottom set is standard), where you will never see big pots unless you have boat vs boat or set vs strong combo draw all-in on the flop. It's not hard to find that sort of game at the lower limits, where there is high percentage of flops seen for the table but the pots aren't big.
One LAG can drive up the average pot size fairly much compared to other tables which have otherwise similar table composition, just because you now have more bets being made and called on the flop and turn. If you want a good, loose table, you should look for one which has a lot of multi-way raised pots. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Definition of a loose game in PL Omaha?
[ QUOTE ]
i would say that a full table at Omaha the flop % are about the same as hold em, maybe a 45% as an average. [/ QUOTE ] Where do you see Holdem games with that percentage? I'd consider 27% in full ring nlh as loose these days. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Definition of a loose game in PL Omaha?
[ QUOTE ]
Loose players are irrelevant. What you're interested in is bad players. I hope you understand the difference. [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Definition of a loose game in PL Omaha?
the biggest thing to look for is pots often opened from early positions and not many raises preflop. those are the loosest and best games in general that you find fairly often.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Definition of a loose game in PL Omaha?
hehe i stopped playing NLHE about 2 years ago when the games started getting excessivly tight!
|
|
|