|
|
|
|
#1
04-06-2007, 08:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fading the Tiger
Sorry, I see that that's obvious from the thread title, which I didn't notice once I was in it. I would've written:
Vijay (+190) v Tiger 2u, as it's obvious what you're on. But you're right, it was clear. This is +200 at Sportbet, btw. Edit: +210 at VIP. 
|
|
#2
04-06-2007, 12:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fading the Tiger
I know I made the play yesterday of Vijay v. Tiger, but I just have a feeling from the way Tiger headed to the range yesterday after his round he's going to post a good number today.
Not to say that +210 isn't a decent grab. I don't have a Vijay/Tiger matchup at my book though.
|
|
#3
04-06-2007, 12:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fading the Tiger
Friday Plays (Cross post, reasoning in other masters thread):
Westwood (+120) v Allenby (1 unit) Ogilvy (-115) v Els (1 unit) Olazabal (+110) v. Howell III (1 unit) Mickelson (-120) v Scott (1 unit) Masters 2007 0-2-1 -2.3 units on 5.3 units wagered
|
|
#4
04-06-2007, 08:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fading the Tiger
[ QUOTE ]
Friday Plays (Cross post, reasoning in other masters thread): Westwood (+120) v Allenby (1 unit) Ogilvy (-115) v Els (1 unit) Olazabal (+110) v. Howell III (1 unit) Mickelson (-120) v Scott (1 unit) Masters 2007 0-2-1 -2.3 units on 5.3 units wagered [/ QUOTE ] Good day for matchups going 4-0-0: Westwood (+120) v Allenby (1 unit) <font color="green"> WIN </font> Ogilvy (-115) v Els (1 unit) <font color="green"> WIN </font> Olazabal (+110) v. Howell III (1 unit) <font color="green"> WIN </font> Mickelson (-120) v Scott (1 unit) <font color="green"> WIN </font> Masters 2007 4-2-1 +2.0 units on 9.65 units wagered.
|
|
#5
04-06-2007, 11:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fading the Tiger
Well played, rdh. Tomorrow's line on the Tiger/Vijay matchup is Veej+170 which is too low to be interesting to me. Probably no fade opportunities for el Tigre tomorrow.
|
|
#6
04-06-2007, 12:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fading the Tiger
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, I see that that's obvious from the thread title, which I didn't notice once I was in it. I would've written: Vijay (+190) v Tiger 2u, as it's obvious what you're on. But you're right, it was clear. This is +200 at Sportbet, btw. Edit: +210 at VIP. [/ QUOTE ] I hadn't looked at the scoreboard yet this morning, but +210 looks AWESOME with Vijay -2 through 6. NICE.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
