|
|
#11
04-05-2007, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU vs. river overbet
I tend to think that if someone can bluff for $300-$400, why would they risk double that for the same result? Perhpas he's trying to setup some kind of meta game early with you, but in general this is a fold almost 100% to me. I'd need a better read, for instance, knowing this guy is creating an odd risk/reward ratio for himself, to start calling here.
|
|
#14
04-05-2007, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU vs. river overbet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Results: He shows A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] ??? aaand? [/ QUOTE ] aaaaaaaaand A-high is no good
|
|
#15
04-05-2007, 07:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU vs. river overbet
[ QUOTE ]
Is a turn check with the intention of calling most river bets or value betting if checked to here horrible, and if so, why? Would you usually go for a turn bet over a turn check? [/ QUOTE ] I like a turn bet for a few reasons: -K is unlikely to have helped him -It is a card I would fire with air a lot, so if this gets shown down it should discourage him from calling light in the future I would probably check it more if I had QT or something
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
