Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2007, 09:28 AM
mjk2800 mjk2800 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Default Foxwoods 1/2

I have been playing this game ever since buy in raised to $300. I agree that the quality of play is horrid and I can't even remember a losing session here.

I am starting to feel like I am becoming a worse player in general by playing this game even though I continue to win consistently.

I am going this week and am going to play 2/5 instead. Is the quality of player really that much better? I am assuming I can't value bet TPTK on the river but what type of players can I expect to encounter.

I am starting to realize that winning at 1/2 consistently really does not mean much and that if I want to become a better player I need to play against better players. But then again if there is not much more profit at 2/5, is there any sense in moving up from a pure profit standpoint? Is there more profit to be made at 2/5? I easily have the bankroll for 2/5.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2007, 10:31 AM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: Foxwoods 1/2

2/5 is a real easy game as well, 5/10 live even has a good amount of bad players also. You will have no problem with it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2007, 11:19 AM
WMB WMB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 438
Default Re: Foxwoods 1/2

2-5 during the week can often be populated with weak tight types. my feeling is if you want to play against better players(although not necessarily better, just tighter), go ahead and move up. at night and weekends the game may loosen up more, but overall the 1-2 is more profitable IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-03-2007, 11:36 AM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gibbering incoherently
Posts: 5,805
Default Re: Foxwoods 1/2

The 5/10 and 1/2 games are both better than the 2/5 in my experience.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-03-2007, 11:38 AM
mjk2800 mjk2800 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Default Re: Foxwoods 1/2

Thanks. Hopefully a quick review of Miller's chapter in Theory and Practice on weak tight will get me in the right mindset.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-03-2007, 11:40 AM
BK1248 BK1248 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 757
Default Re: Foxwoods 1/2

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks. Hopefully a quick review of Miller's chapter in Theory and Practice on weak tight will get me in the right mindset.

[/ QUOTE ]

the so called "best players" are weak tight dopes anyway, i used to play limit with them before the NL boom and they sucked there, now they are just nut peddlers in NL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-03-2007, 11:47 AM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,596
Default Re: Foxwoods 1/2

I play all of the NL games pretty regularly in 10-60 minute sessions waiting for tables. I agree with ghazban's post completely. There is usually a bit more money on the table in the 2/5 game than the 1/2 but there is soooo much more action in the 1/2.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.