#1
|
|||
|
|||
NLTRN - Playing Two Tables vs. One Table At A Time
Do any of you guys play two HU matches at once (or more than two)?
I would imagine this would lower your win rate%, but this might possibly increase your hourly wage. Just wondering what kind of experience you guys have had with playing two HU matches at once. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN - Playing Two Tables vs. One Table At A Time
I find I miss too much stuff to make it worth it for me, or at least to feel it is worth it for me.
I want to experiment when I reach a better level of play though, I will probably try to 2-3 table a lower limit and see how I do over a bigger sample size. Right now I don't have the BR to mess around with that. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN - Playing Two Tables vs. One Table At A Time
I would imagine it would be very difficult to do this at a high stakes level.
However, if one were to get good enough playing 2-3 tables at once at a low level game, I think they would be able to make a higher hourly wage than playing 1 high stakes game at a time. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN - Playing Two Tables vs. One Table At A Time
The high stakes HU cash gamers seem to have mixed views on this.
Aba has mentioned a few times that he can only play 3-4 at near 100% skill, but others pros like Boosted J and Jman can play 6-8+ tables HU on FTP without a problem. I'm not sure about how the higher HU SNG players like Genius or The Camel or someone like that view playing multiple tables, but I would imagine if a fish sat down at 2-3 $500 HUSNG they would be playing every single one of them. Also, we all know how Elky likes to play HUSNG. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN - Playing Two Tables vs. One Table At A Time
Playing HU cash is much easier than playing HU sng's on multitables, the dynamic stack sizes make it very hard to play more than one possibly two tables.
|
|
|