![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who would be interested? It could be $50,$100 or $200
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I might be interested if the league was a) a bit smaller, and b) didn't require you to draft 34 catchers.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How small? I like a smaller league too.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd consider it.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the bigger the better
and yeah, I'm in |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it should be big but in the right spots.
Best league is 1-C 2-1B 1-2B 1-SS 2-3B 1-MI 5-OF 1-Util 3-SP 2-RP 3-P 3 Spots for the bench This is perfect for a 10 team league, use 5x5 scoring except change avg to either OBP or OPS. Adjust the number of positions based on number of people |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am DEFINITELY in. I would be up for any amt up to 1k.
Lets run it on ESPN though, their fantasy site is much better than Yahoo. I also would prefer more players per team rather than less. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
conditionally in based on format and amt
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
it should be big but in the right spots. Best league is 1-C 2-1B 1-2B 1-SS 2-3B 1-MI 5-OF 1-Util 3-SP 2-RP 3-P 3 Spots for the bench This is perfect for a 10 team league, use 5x5 scoring except change avg to either OBP or OPS. Adjust the number of positions based on number of people [/ QUOTE ] I don't understand this. Some positions you just randomly need double and some you don't. What's the logic out of curiousity? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
has to do with the depth of the position. You want to go deep in positions so you get the fun and talent of finding sleepers but not so deep that everyone is equally [censored]
|
![]() |
|
|