Clemson WVU in NIT

[PropPlayer]

[ QUOTE ]
Well which side is which?? Cause I'd rather take QQ over slick

[/ QUOTE ]

You must not play at PokerStars.



j/k I hear this all the time and couldn't resist.

[paperchamp]

I've been on Clemson -1 since yesterday.

[rdh009]

Clemson -.5 1h sure turned out well...

[iggymcfly]

I suppose I'll regret this too, but I'm taking WVU +4 (-105) in the second half. Clemson struggled against the 1-3-1 and looked sloppy and unmotivated on defense in the first half. Also, they have been a first-half team this year, so if they were going to show something, you'd expect them to show it then. Better than market price at Bodog, and the possibility of FTs covering even if Clemson comes back is enough to push me over the top.

[scottedont]

I smell a blow out.....and I'm on Clemson -1 DOH!

[livin_a_lie]

[ QUOTE ]
but I'm taking WVU +4 (-105) in the second half.

[/ QUOTE ]

What a sick way to lose that [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[PropPlayer]

no kidding I remembered his bet too and I turned back on the game with 1 min left and Clemson was down by 16 pts. there was 1 min and seconds left - not over 1:09. Was it an 11-0 run in final minute? that was sick

[iggymcfly]

Yeah, that sucked. Clemson finally comes alive when they're down 16 with :45 left to finish the game on an 11-0 run for the backdoor cover.

[pktsfullofhope]

when these college tournies get down to the final 4 teams, there is almost no edge in betting these games. Nobody can guess the outcome, and the lines are so tight that I feel it's retarded to touch these games.

[paperchamp]

[ QUOTE ]
when these college tournies get down to the final 4 teams, there is almost no edge in betting these games. Nobody can guess the outcome, and the lines are so tight that I feel it's retarded to touch these games.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not true.