#1
|
|||
|
|||
(50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
No reads on Villain he's playing at this table for about 15 hands or something. Thanks.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) UTG ($12.95) UTG+1 ($28.25) MP1 ($52.15) MP2 ($50.85) Hero ($74.65) CO ($46.20) Button ($8) SB ($47.75) BB ($50.15) Preflop: Hero is MP3 with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Hero calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, BB checks. Flop: ($1.75) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $1</font>, BB folds, UTG calls $1. Turn: ($3.75) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $11.45 (All-In)</font>, Hero folds. Final Pot: $15.20 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
looks good to me. there are way too many hands that have you crushed
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
A) You may already be beat. Villain could have A10, A8 or a hand like 56d that doesn't want to see another diamond come off. He also could have QJ no diamond, tried to get cute on the flop and then hit the panic button on the turn.
B) If you are ahead right now, there's a ton of cards that might beat you on the river. KQ with a diamond, an ace with a jack of diamonds, etc. You're only getting like 1.3 to 1 on your money. Fold. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
[ QUOTE ]
looks good to me. there are way too many hands that have you crushed [/ QUOTE ] Nice!! Two pair is not that strong here. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
this seems pretty standard. I would have bet full pot on the flop bc Villian is a short stack and will likely pay off with any A, and I don't want him to draw cheaply.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
Yeah I bet 1.50 on flop. Definitely fold turn.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
I am rookie myself and learning like you but heres my take:
Calling with this hand at a 9 handed table is very -EV.My first play would be to fold but if you are going to play this hand I would raise it up to drive out some somebody that will limp with any Ax or suited connectors. Limping here just encourages more limpers with better hands than yours. Maybe someone will give advice on my advice! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
ty all
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
[ QUOTE ]
I am rookie myself and learning like you but heres my take: Calling with this hand at a 9 handed table is very -EV.My first play would be to fold but if you are going to play this hand I would raise it up to drive out some somebody that will limp with any Ax or suited connectors. Limping here just encourages more limpers with better hands than yours. Maybe someone will give advice on my advice! [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. Full ring is brutal. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (50NL) 2 pair facing all-in on 3-flush turn
yeah I was guessing about that one also. Is it ok my PF play? I thought about raising maybe I would if limper was MP or something like that.
What's your line here? Ty |
|
|