#1
|
|||
|
|||
line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Tournament Blinds: t15/t30 9 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: t1230.00 Hero: t120.00 MP1: t1560.00 MP2: t3180.00 MP3: t3285.00 CO: t1380.00 Button: t1440.00 SB: t1500.00 BB: t1305.00 Pre-flop: (9 players) Hero is UTG+1 with T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] CO calls, Button folds, SB calls, BB calls, UTG folds, Hero calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 (poster) checks. Flop: J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (t210, 7 players) MP3 checks, CO checks, SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets t30</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
So your stack is 120 and you limp UTG+1 for 30, right ?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
What are you trying to say Rex? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
Push allin PF in you think thats the best hand you will get before the blinds hit you again.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
[ QUOTE ]
So your stack is 120 and you limp UTG+1 for 30, right ? [/ QUOTE ] Exactly. I have no desire to double up, much less steal the blinds. To double up here would be devastation $/h -wise, I don't want to spend another 10 minutes in this SNG with t240 looking for spots to get it in. I want to play a multiway pot with a hand that does well in multiway pots and n-tuple up back to contention. If my limp doesn't accomplish a multiway pot, it might still be good if it induces other limpers behind me, and then a LP squeeze, and I'd end up HU with massive overlay. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
Seems that I or the converter messed up the conversion, you can assume normal order of play on each round.
The question remains the same: should I look to double up here or am I correct to look for more with this hand and stack size? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
You realize that, say, 70% of the time, someone will raise behind and you will end heads-up with no impetus and a bad hand.
I mean : here it seems that you say to me, look how good my play was BECAUSE the flop gives me OESFD vs 354681313 opponents. Now let's say the flop is 29Q, one heart. How good does your limp look, now ? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the flop bet.
Egads. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
push pf
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: line check \"6-tuple or bust\" (a.k.a down to t120 level 1)
PF has already been talked about, so I'll move onto the flop. While most people would probably advise to just shove here with the great draw I don't mind a minbet. People who have a J or Q will be calling your 90 anyway and your draw beats just about anything else that could call you that wouldn't otherwise so you might as well build the pot as best you can. For most circumstances you can assume you are winning the pot if you hit your draw and losing in other cases. If you lose after hitting then theres nothing you can do about it.
|
|
|