|
|
#1
02-19-2006, 10:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
SNG Article I Wrote
|
|
#2
02-19-2006, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SNG Article I Wrote
I kinda skimmed over most of the math stuff, but it looks like a great intro to ICM for someone who is new to the concept. You basically summed up 90% of what this forum is, haha. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#3
02-19-2006, 11:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SNG Article I Wrote
Are you going to submit it to 2+2 Magazine?
Flight_Risk
|
|
#5
02-19-2006, 11:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SNG Article I Wrote
[ QUOTE ]
Are you going to submit it to 2+2 Magazine? Flight_Risk [/ QUOTE ] No. I'm just going to leave it on my website. I'm under the impression that I can't both submit it to 2+2 and leave it on my website.
|
|
#6
02-19-2006, 11:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SNG Article I Wrote
I like the article, but having articles in that box is annoying.
|
|
#9
02-19-2006, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SNG Article I Wrote
Good article, lucidly written. Pretty basic stuff for most SNG devotees of course. One thing I thought you might stress was that the advice to move in with any two can be wildly wrong versus opponents who play suboptimally. I've never played a $11 in my life but I imagine moving in here with 72o would be suicidal.
Edit: For example, you might point out without going through all the maths that versus opponents who call top 25% here, which is not at all unheard of for loose opponents, moving in with 72o loses $10.66.
|
|
#10
02-19-2006, 11:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SNG Article I Wrote
[ QUOTE ]
Good article, lucidly written. Pretty basic stuff for most SNG devotees of course. One thing I thought you might stress was that the advice to move in with any two can be wildly wrong versus opponents who play suboptimally. I've never played a $11 in my life but I imagine moving in here with 72o would be suicidal. [/ QUOTE ] not necessarily true. just because $11 players are bad, that doesn't mean they are all very loose. Some are very bad because they are too tight.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
