Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-24-2007, 03:15 PM
doubLe a tom doubLe a tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: str8 cash homey
Posts: 5,977
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

lol OP, Good sample size. That is very standard, and mild variance.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-24-2007, 03:18 PM
fusting4321 fusting4321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 614
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

[ QUOTE ]



3) you lose 10 sng's in a row (assuming "equal skill" this would be 0.7 to the power of 10



[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe we shouldnt be assuming equal skill, no? Hint Hint
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-24-2007, 03:22 PM
NU Star NU Star is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,923
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

[ QUOTE ]
Just because something unlikely happens doesn't mean that it's rigged. What are the chances that you'll be dealt 5d 4h on one hand, and then 7s Th on the next hand? 1 in 7,033,103. That's extremely unlikely. But just because you were dealt those two hands back to back doesn't mean that online poker is rigged.

BBV: Serious Business

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems wrong...unless it has to be those cards in that specific order.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-24-2007, 03:23 PM
kylma kylma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 288
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]



3) you lose 10 sng's in a row (assuming "equal skill" this would be 0.7 to the power of 10



[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe we shouldnt be assuming equal skill, no? Hint Hint

[/ QUOTE ]

You're correct.. My ROI is 16%. so it's not equal skill. I just made it more simple for the sake of simplification
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-24-2007, 03:25 PM
SneakyFerret SneakyFerret is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: somewhere between Madison and Eugene
Posts: 631
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

[ QUOTE ]


I said top top, not two pair..

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-24-2007, 03:53 PM
OHFreak OHFreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Posts: 1,691
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

I SAID TOP TOP M'FER
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-24-2007, 03:55 PM
saucyspade19 saucyspade19 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 802
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I said top top, not two pair..

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

a jamie gold reference in a thread about variance, ha, how appropriate.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-24-2007, 04:00 PM
pokerchap pokerchap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: selling cake money FO FREE
Posts: 2,345
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

let me guess.. full tilt?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-24-2007, 05:32 PM
AlwaysWrong AlwaysWrong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold callers anonymous
Posts: 272
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

Here's a better question: What are the chances that if I go back and look at my last 10,000 hands I can find some stat that in isolation looks extremely unlikely? I'd go for nearly certain, if I look hard enough.

This thread is either a joke (and not that funny) or OP should never play poker again.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-24-2007, 05:37 PM
GrandMelon GrandMelon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: getting coolered
Posts: 4,707
Default Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question

[ QUOTE ]
[x] you might suck

[/ QUOTE ]

wait.. fixed my own post

[x] you do suck
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.