#1
|
|||
|
|||
NLCASH - limit vs rake
I have no idea how to check this out.
What do you think - on which level the rake is not that big part of the pots (so winrate also) so you can play it more profitable. Somewhere I red that playing for ex. on NL50 is very hard because of that, you need to have higher winrate just to beat the rake. What about higher levels? , Thanks PS. Sorry for my english, it's not my native language [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLCASH - limit vs rake
I would say that you have to play at the very least $5 - 10 limit online. Even at these stakes the rake is very significant. Getting a rakeback deal is essential IMO.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLCASH - limit vs rake
I mean limit as level, the question is about HUNL cashgames [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLCASH - limit vs rake
It's commonly accepted that bellow NL$200 the rake is too high and you should stick to HU SNGs.
Unless you can find a megadonk in which case rake doesn't matter [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
|