|
|
#103
03-12-2007, 03:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP Answers 2/23
I think a lot of people here becoming way to harsh on Doug himself. All of these things aren't his personal responsibility and it's very nice for him to go out of his way just to answer the questions when he does. There's a difference between asking questions in a respectable tone and voicing frustrations with FTP while NOT flaming doug.
And remember, people shouldn't be getting mad at doug for FTP's suckiness and lack of courtesy to it's players. He's just the messenger. 
|
|
#104
03-12-2007, 02:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 2/23
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] DeNutza: Because you can get rakeback at FTP. [/ QUOTE ] I thought they didnt allow rake back? If true, why should the average poker player suffer just because FT chooses to use affiliates? [/ QUOTE ] It's Party Poker that doesn't allow rakeback, but some people get it anyway. PokerStars doesn't allow it as well, and there's no way you're going to get it there (it has to do with the way affiliates are paid). About the average player suffering: You're absolutely right. This also means that the fish will run out of money more quickly, which is bad.
|
|
#106
03-13-2007, 12:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 2/23
Again about rakeback.....I just don't understand why if I signed up through the ftp site no affiliate and have never deposited/withdrawn on the account I can't be switched to an affiliate to get rakeback or create a new account, if I had signed up with an affiliate and not got rakeback then yeah fair enough my fault, but I signed up directly through the ftp site just to play play money.
I would love to play on ftp and would play a decent ammount but I'm not going to bother without rakeback when I can get it elsewhere.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
