Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2007, 10:32 AM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,596
Default a few silly caps

these are all live 20/40.

- five limpers (all but one are terrible), I raise TT in the SB, bb calls, limpers all call but the button 3bets (this is 100% bs). I cap.

- lagfish regular raises HJ, CO 3bets, I cold cap 88 on the button. CO is a taggish regular. don't know him that well but he's decent, my impression is he's weakish, misses some bets, makes too many "big" folds. he's isolating widely though.

- this game is off the hook, most flops are 5-7 ways for 2-4 bets. six limpers to me (it's not rare to have six in so far but it is very rare that they all limped). I raise JTs on the button, SB 3bets, bb calls, everyone calls, I cap. 3bettor is the taggish guy from previous hand and his range is narrow here (AA/KK/AKs with some very real chance of QQ/JJ/AKo/tilt).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2007, 10:42 AM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spewing since 2004.
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: a few silly caps

1 and 2 seem fine. 3 seems a bit more meh.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:27 AM
Frond Frond is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Liddsville
Posts: 1,796
Default Re: a few silly caps

1 like
2 like but not as much as 1
3 don't like
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2007, 05:26 PM
hedgetop hedgetop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 63
Default Re: a few silly caps

These caps are losing moves, the first is the worst as TT 7-way first to act is a pretty poor position to cap it. If you thought that others would fold then it would be much better, but based on your description that doesn't look likely. If you believe that the 3 bettor's range in the third situation is that tight then why do you cap?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2007, 05:32 PM
ILOVEPOKER929 ILOVEPOKER929 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Omaha Fish
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: a few silly caps

First cap is standard.

Second cap I dont like. I would rather fold.

3rd cap is fine. Im basically indifferent on this one.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2007, 05:47 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,596
Default Re: a few silly caps

"Second cap I dont like. I would rather fold."

where do you draw the line? TT? I know you play live a lot, are there players (like I described) that you know of that you would cold cap 88 here? or is just having a decent player 3betting enough to fold?

maybe this is a better way to phrase the question: obv if you know something like J7o is in the 3bettor's range this is an easy cap right? What if you know he can 3bet with A2o? A7o? where's the cutoff, put that way?


on hand 3 I just played around with stove a bit and it looks like I have around 14% equity. without the 3bettor it's 17. fair share is 11%.

I used this range for the limpers and gave BB a random hand:
99-22,A9s-A2s,KTs-K2s,Q2s+,J5s+,T5s+,95s+,84s+,74s+,63s+,53s+,43s,32 s,ATo-A2o,KTo-K2o,Q7o+,J7o+,T7o+,97o+,86o+,75o+,64o+,54o
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2007, 09:01 PM
Nate. Nate. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Reading Garner\'s usage dictionary
Posts: 2,189
Default Re: a few silly caps

jba --

First one is clear given the information you provided. Not capping is burning money.

I'm a bad guy to ask about the second one because I rely on physical reads so much in this spot that I'm rusty at the arithmetic. Readless, TT+, AQ+ seems right.

You seem to have shown that you've got an edge to push in the third case. Nice cap. I don't see any postflop disadvantage that could outweigh the money you're gaining.

--Nate
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-13-2007, 02:03 AM
ILOVEPOKER929 ILOVEPOKER929 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Omaha Fish
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: a few silly caps

[ QUOTE ]
"Second cap I dont like. I would rather fold."

where do you draw the line? TT? I know you play live a lot, are there players (like I described) that you know of that you would cold cap 88 here? or is just having a decent player 3betting enough to fold?

maybe this is a better way to phrase the question: obv if you know something like J7o is in the 3bettor's range this is an easy cap right? What if you know he can 3bet with A2o? A7o? where's the cutoff, put that way?


on hand 3 I just played around with stove a bit and it looks like I have around 14% equity. without the 3bettor it's 17. fair share is 11%.

I used this range for the limpers and gave BB a random hand:
99-22,A9s-A2s,KTs-K2s,Q2s+,J5s+,T5s+,95s+,84s+,74s+,63s+,53s+,43s,32 s,ATo-A2o,KTo-K2o,Q7o+,J7o+,T7o+,97o+,86o+,75o+,64o+,54o

[/ QUOTE ]

Keep in mind I said I dont like the cap. I have no way of knowing if it was wrong or not. TT would be my CO here, and yes, the decent player 3betting is enough for me to fold 88. Basically whenever im faced with a situation preflop where two plays run close in expectation(ie im not sure which play is better) I will usually choose the lower variance play.

If the 3bettor has any of those hands you mentioned (J7o,A7o,A2o) in his range then I would cap preflop, especically since it appears you have a good line on his postflop play. This assumes though that our inference that "If he has any of these hands in his range it also means he has many other trash type hands." will be accurate.

On a final note...I know youre a winning player Jba, and I wasnt there, so if you tell me that capping with 88's in this spot is the right play, I will believe you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.