#1
|
|||
|
|||
PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
Even at 10NL stars is kind of nitty. Finding a ppf of 50+% is hard, which is frustrating me. I currently have a br of 240$ and playing $10 NL at stars, am getting frustrated with the rocky play. I am thinking that for a non-us player that can go anywhere (No FT RB), stars is not the best choice. Does anyone have any suggestions of a good site to play a? (Soft cash games, etc)
Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
Hi Low,
I find that the UK site Stan James has some very loose low-stakes NL cash games. They have a good amount of site traffic and the support is very helpful. Hope this helps. BM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
bump
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
[ QUOTE ]
bump [/ QUOTE ] No need. Non americans don't matter. Just kidding. Stay off of US sites they are teh rock garden. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
Yeah sites that allow Americans are generally tighter than those that don't. The only reason to play them is if you are playing mid-high stakes, as they generally have more games at those levels.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
uh Party Poker?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
try WPEX...no mo rake
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
wow please play on party
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
Absolute has some loose, but aggressive games.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerStars bad choice for non-us players?
When Pacific still accepted U.S. players it was fish central. It tightened up a tad in '06 but I couldn't have imagined it tightening up anymore - most of the donks there were from the U.K. True story.
|
|
|