#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
if you fold a lower set everytime you're 95% sure someone has a higher set (looks like it here) you never give yourself a chance to spike quads. push.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
lol. you can still spike quads the times you have no idea you're up against a higher set.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
Yeah, I think I wrote fold in there somewhere. I just realized I didn't really make it clear.
I agree, 100% fold. I think I was the most forgiving as was possible with hand ranges; realistically after that action a set is more likely for CO and SB IMO. To make up for my vaguery in previous post, again, fold. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
fold
That's why I play 6max, but given the action I would fold easily.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
Well, what do you put the 3-bettor on? He's got to have 2 pr, and there is a good chance that he has your quad out. If I was Hero, I would have folded after Villain called.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
Isnt his range for sb way too wide?
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
If the range is too wide, that swings it even more towards a fold. As it is with that range, it's still a fold, so it doesn't matter.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
[ QUOTE ]
Rotain, I 100% agree 100% with all your ranges of hands, but I think those calculations clearly show this is a fold nonetheless. I don't understand why people are so unwilling to fold here. [/ QUOTE ] Oops, typo. I meant to say I DONT agree 100% with all the ranges. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
yeah, seems like a clear fold
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: observed hand: crazy flop action with bottom set on dry board
All, shouldnt we include the other 33 in our possible hand ranges? I think this leans it to a call.
-James |
|
|