|
|
#11
02-26-2007, 02:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
This board seems perfect for stack-a-donk to me. Or whatever it's called when you bet flop the crai on the turn. The board is dry so he's likely to have a K or if he's floating he'll try to take it away from you on the turn with a bet. As played both push and fold are fine. I think the fact that there is no a fd would make me push and be upset when I get shown KJ
|
|
#14
02-26-2007, 02:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Following Baluga very strictly = +EV [/ QUOTE ] QFMFT. [/ QUOTE ] a) what the hell are you talking about? b) this guy goes to showdown 36% and it's blind v blind. folding sucks.
|
|
#15
02-26-2007, 03:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Following Baluga very strictly = +EV [/ QUOTE ] QFMFT. [/ QUOTE ] a) what the hell are you talking about? b) this guy goes to showdown 36% and it's blind v blind. folding sucks. [/ QUOTE ] This villain doesn't care if it's BvB, and his 36% of times at showdown wasn't for his entire stack. I iggy Baluga with donks in these spots and constantly ship it to them. I think it's close...
|
|
#16
02-26-2007, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
Shove. Especially with the read you have given.
|
|
#17
02-26-2007, 03:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Following Baluga very strictly = +EV [/ QUOTE ] QFMFT. [/ QUOTE ] a) what the hell are you talking about? b) this guy goes to showdown 36% and it's blind v blind. folding sucks. [/ QUOTE ] Going against baluga theorem is throwing away money imo. Its bvb yeah, but I have learned through long and painful experience to always err on the side of folding overpairs to turn raises. This ain't a SNG mang [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#18
02-26-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Following Baluga very strictly = +EV [/ QUOTE ] QFMFT. [/ QUOTE ] a) what the hell are you talking about? b) this guy goes to showdown 36% and it's blind v blind. folding sucks. [/ QUOTE ] Going against baluga theorem is throwing away money imo. Its bvb yeah, but I have learned through long and painful experience to always err on the side of folding overpairs to turn raises. This ain't a SNG mang [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] what is baluga theorem? flop call + turn raise = set?
|
|
#19
02-26-2007, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Following Baluga very strictly = +EV [/ QUOTE ] QFMFT. [/ QUOTE ] a) what the hell are you talking about? b) this guy goes to showdown 36% and it's blind v blind. folding sucks. [/ QUOTE ] Going against baluga theorem is throwing away money imo. Its bvb yeah, but I have learned through long and painful experience to always err on the side of folding overpairs to turn raises. This ain't a SNG mang [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] what is baluga theorem? flop call + turn raise = set? [/ QUOTE ] When you get raised on the turn (especially a c-r) your one pair hand is no good vs. nearly all players. A few exceptions such as AA on a JQ22 board or something similar, but for the most part you should nearly always ditch an overpair or top pair to a turn raise.
|
|
#20
02-26-2007, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL - AA in blindvblind
You could fold (best choice), call and re-evaluate the river (second best choice), or go all in (the least attractive option here).
Massive calling stations call down, they don't raise often. When they do, one pair = no good.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
