#101
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
[ QUOTE ]
You only need to worry about how I can make you money. And I only need to worry about how you can make me money. [/ QUOTE ] Don't worry, Be happy |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
PING
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
[ QUOTE ]
So my basic point is that all of a person's social interactions are centered on personal gain. [/ QUOTE ] Interesting little side note. The things that make most people happy are also the things that are helpful in procreating. So by being selfish you are propagating the species. So it is both selfish and unselfish at the same time....... |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
EDIT: I want to add that I am not trying to be insulting. I have learned and profited a lot from your endeavors. I have a HUGE amount of repect for your work. I am just trying to point out that I feel you are being misleading in ths instance.
[ QUOTE ] You are completely contradicting yourself. If page views was part of the reason for the picture, which of course it was, that's strong evidence the picture was posed. [/ QUOTE ] No, I'm not. From the start I thought it was an attempt at page views/2p2 interest/ad $$$, but I really couldn't blame someone for thinking otherwise and I wouldn't have been all that surprised if I was wrong. My point is that you essentially insulting those who thought it was real is unfounded because it really wouldn't be all that farfetched to think that given the recent actions of both of you. Therefore, the Bayes Theorem argument you presented isn't really very strong. [ QUOTE ] ...was willing to play along with me in a fun experiment to see how many readers would apply Baye's Theorem [/ QUOTE ] I feel like you know that and are just using Bayes as an attempt to act like all of this had an intellectual purpose, which it didn't. It was blatant attention whoring. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
He used Bayes Theorem to show that the Bayes Theorem argument does not work. lol
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
Side note: What's more likely? That pairtheboard just happens to only be allowed to post in the Special Sklansky Forum because the 2+2 mods made that arbitrary decision or that pairtheboard only posts in SSF because he's Sklansky's gimmick account? Would Bayes Theorem be helpful in answering this question?
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
[ QUOTE ]
You are completely contradicting yourself. If page views was part of the reason for the picture, which of course it was, that's strong evidence the picture was posed. [/ QUOTE ] Nh sir. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
[ QUOTE ]
If she does, none of that came across in the ten minutes total I have spoken to her in my life. [/ QUOTE ] DS, Based on an account from a good friend, I'll wager $100K that you spent far more than "10 minutes total" with Brandi. Any reasonable terms based on your above quoted statement accepted. An NVG panel can decide the outcome based on evidence I'll present. Bet or no bet? |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
hahahahah and the plot thickens.
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Comparing Brandi To \"Saura\"
[ QUOTE ]
hahahahah and the plot thickens. [/ QUOTE ] No it doesn't. Don't tempt me to play around some more. Our two short conversations were all business. |
|
|