|
|
#11
02-16-2007, 05:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL: play this river
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah push we only losing to AA, KK or a 66 and he'll call us with mid pairs even a 5 if he's that bad. [/ QUOTE ] Waoo 66, I allways knew this site was riged [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] 
|
|
#13
02-16-2007, 01:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL: play this river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yeah push we only losing to AA, KK or a 66 and he'll call us with mid pairs even a 5 if he's that bad. [/ QUOTE ] Waoo 66, I allways knew this site was riged [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Oh yeah lol ooops. I meant a single 6. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] If he has 66 give Lee Jones a call.
|
|
#14
02-16-2007, 01:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL: play this river
[ QUOTE ]
I think it's a push. Berge - Why wouldn't villain with those stats PSB trips on this board? [/ QUOTE ] Obviously it depends on the villian and I don't want to paint a broad stroke here, but someone who is fairly LAGy tends to play monsters much slower than draws, one-pair hands or bluffs.
|
|
#15
02-16-2007, 03:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL: play this river
I hate river donk bets like this from lagtards. Looks like he's got a big hand maybe... but, my first instinct is to shove (would this guy donk 77-JJ thinking it's the nuts?).
Obviously the safe route is to call. Depending on how confident I am that he'd make this play with 77-JJ I'm willing to shove the extra $45 in there. Otherwise just call...
|
|
#16
02-16-2007, 03:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL: play this river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think it's a push. Berge - Why wouldn't villain with those stats PSB trips on this board? [/ QUOTE ] Obviously it depends on the villian and I don't want to paint a broad stroke here, but someone who is fairly LAGy tends to play monsters much slower than draws, one-pair hands or bluffs. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, that's why I'm not as inclined to shove... but he could be overvaluing his hand. A call is probably best barring a strong read.
|
|
#17
02-17-2007, 12:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL: play this river
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously it depends on the villian and I don't want to paint a broad stroke here, but someone who is fairly LAGy tends to play monsters much slower than draws, one-pair hands or bluffs. [/ QUOTE ]I'm confused now. Isn't the whole point of being a LAG that when you get a monster you can bet bet bet and get paid off when someone calls you down with TPMK?
|
|
#18
02-17-2007, 12:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL: play this river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Obviously it depends on the villian and I don't want to paint a broad stroke here, but someone who is fairly LAGy tends to play monsters much slower than draws, one-pair hands or bluffs. [/ QUOTE ]I'm confused now. Isn't the whole point of being a LAG that when you get a monster you can bet bet bet and get paid off when someone calls you down with TPMK? [/ QUOTE ] the whole point? no. just a benefit of. villain are forced to call you down light (and correctly so) because of the greatly increased chance you are betting light. Trying to avoid paying off a LAG puts you in a very exploitable position.
|
|
#19
02-17-2007, 12:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL: play this river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Obviously it depends on the villian and I don't want to paint a broad stroke here, but someone who is fairly LAGy tends to play monsters much slower than draws, one-pair hands or bluffs. [/ QUOTE ]I'm confused now. Isn't the whole point of being a LAG that when you get a monster you can bet bet bet and get paid off when someone calls you down with TPMK? [/ QUOTE ] Now you're confusing a decent LAG with a standard low-stakes LAG [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
