|
View Poll Results: Would you die? | |||
Probably | 199 | 76.54% | |
Probably not | 51 | 19.62% | |
Unsure/show me results | 10 | 3.85% | |
Voters: 260. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
2 to 3 is optimal for me in order to play my A ++ game. But in terms of $$ i would say between 4 and 8 depending on mood.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
The obvious answer is 9-12 tables for optimal play <font color="white"> if you're a full-ring nit! </font>
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
[ QUOTE ]
The obvious answer is 9-12 tables for optimal play <font color="white"> if you're a full-ring nit! </font> [/ QUOTE ] He sure is right! 3-4 tables is the thing to do! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
[ QUOTE ]
The obvious answer is 9-12 tables for optimal play <font color="white"> if you're a full-ring nit! </font> [/ QUOTE ] Lol, you can barely read the "If your a full-ring nit!" |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
I would get bored playing less than 6 tables
8-12 for SH FR 16+ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
I play 9-12 and still use 6th sense, but I don't pay that much attention to hands I'm not involved in (although I look up most big pots). "Not having enough time to make good decisions" is crap, just think faster.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
Usually 4, I'll go up to 6 if I'm bored or there isn't much action.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
I started at 4, then moved to 6, 8, 10, and 12.
I think im a slight loser at 12 tables, slight winner at 10 tables, a decent winner at 8 tables, and a solid winner at 6. I play between 6-9 tables. However I usually start all sessions playing 4 tables for about 5 minutes just to get in the right mind. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
[ QUOTE ]
I started at 4, then moved to 6, 8, 10, and 12. I think im a slight loser at 12 tables, slight winner at 10 tables, a decent winner at 8 tables, and a solid winner at 6. I play between 6-9 tables. However I usually start all sessions playing 4 tables for about 5 minutes just to get in the right mind. [/ QUOTE ] It really is interesting to see how many players think 1-4 is best. I had the assumption that 50% of the people on this board, multi table 6+ games regularly. Looks like jumping down in table volume will be a good thing for me. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal amount of games to play
I went from 8 to 6 when I moved up. I basically jumped over $100 NL though (from $50 to $200). I like 6. I definitely see myself being able to play just as well with 8 tables, but it may take a while.
|
|
|