live NL game w/ only 50x BB buy-in cap

[Pov]

[ QUOTE ]
The $1/2 NL game at the casino closest to me is $100 min/max buy in. I'm working on building up a bankroll to play this game, how much should I adjust my target from the usual suggestion of 20X buyin to compensate for it being a forced short buy?

I work 4pm to 1am, so sometimes when I arrive at the casino the majority of people at the table are deepstacked ($200ish to over $600). I played badly last trip and I've been trying to think through where to adjust my play. I was definitely playing too many hands preflop, and continuation betting too many hands. The second problem with my cbets was that I was betting too much of my stack without being willing to commit my stack when raised.
What are some other adjustments I can make to be more successful at this game? oppenents are a mixture of loose agressive and a handful of good players.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you can still play quite a few hands if they are cheap before the flop, but you need to be very aware of pot control. What I mean by that is that you need to avoid your second problem. If you raise a hand like KJs, flop a king and then cbet, you've probably just put in a third of your stack. That's not where you want to be with a hand like top pair, decent kicker if you meet resistance. I've become much more apt (in this game structure) to limp this type of hand and then play poker on the flop. Now the flop is small enough I don't mind folding when I'm unsure of where I stand and I still seem to be able to get a big chunk or a whole stack when I flop big with two pair or manage to draw and hit a big straight or flush. The biggest problem seems to be that by not raising, you allow lots of weaker hands into the pot and they can be difficult to read.

Now with a stronger hand like AKs, I go ahead and raise and then go to war when I hit a king and risk a big chunk of my stack unless I really have a reason to believe I've been beaten. In a deeper game it's a big leak to get stacked with TPTK, but in this structure I don't think this is true anymore provided you raised enough preflop to deny your opponents the implied odds to come after you.

Reflecting on my profits, though, I'd say the major contributor has been getting to the flop with a pair either with a limp or by calling a small raise with a few other callers, hitting a set and stacking someone who hit top or two pair. The shallow structure makes it incredibly difficult for players to escape this, particularly when most of these players would have some difficulty escaping even with a full buy-in.

Of course you should realize the things I've just said are somewhat contradictory and that's what lead me to start this thread. By playing the hands like KJs more cheaply, I'm letting the small pair come after me so I seem to be leaving myself open to exactly what I am planning to do to my opponents. So far the spidey-sense and self control seems to be what lets me win on both sides of the equation . . . or I've been lucky. I'm hoping someone can provide a more confident answer.