Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2007, 09:04 PM
Prodigy54321 Prodigy54321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 5,326
Default question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

I'm learning about projectile motion [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]...the question is..

What is the angle of projection from the ground for which the range is a maximum? Can you give a qualitative explanation?

45% obviously..then I wrote out an explanation about how the range is a maximum when sin2(theta) is at it's maximum of 1...2(theta) = 90 degrees....(theta) = 45 degrees

is this considered a "qualitative explanation?"...I think it's more of a quantitative explanation..not sure what my professor is looking for though.

sorry about the stupid question [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2007, 09:28 PM
bunny bunny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,330
Default Re: question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

Maybe he meant some kind of hand-wavy argument? Like if you start by firing straight up, it doesnt go anywhere. If you reduce the angle to 89,88,etc then it goes further and further. However at horizontal it also doesnt go anywhere, because of gravity. It's kinda linear, so the midpoint is likely to be "optimum".

Having said that, your answer is much better (specially for a physics class) - I really dont see the point in a "qualitative" explanation.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2007, 09:35 PM
surftheiop surftheiop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 640
Default Re: question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

I guess you could BS something like
"At 45 degrees half of the energy will go towards keeping the object in the air and half will go towards moving it forward .... and this is like a square ..... and squares maximize things ......"
And hope everyone is impressed (it worked in my highschool physics class)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:28 PM
AWoodside AWoodside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 415
Default Re: question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

I think it's ridiculous to be asking for a qualitative answer to this question (assuming that's all you're asked for). Just show why it's the case and then write some BS. Given that you have the answer correct and can show it mathematically it would be pretty inane to mark you down for your qualitative description.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:41 PM
m_the0ry m_the0ry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 790
Default Re: question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

At 90 degrees we have maximum airtime. At 0 degrees we have minimum airtime. Since projectile distance is distal velocity times airtime, we maximize the distance at the midpoint between the two just like a thevenin equivalent has max power output when the resistors are balanced.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2007, 12:32 AM
Uethym Uethym is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Default Re: question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

Assume that the projectile is launched with velocity v at an angle theta to the ground. The horizontal velocity is then v cos(theta) and the vertical velocity is v sin(theta).

1. Find the amount of time before the projectile hits the ground. Use x = x(0) + v(0)t + (1/2)at^2, where x(0) = 0 (you start on the ground), x = 0 (you finish on the ground), v(0) = vertical velocity, and a = -g (gravitational acceleration). Solve for t.

2. Find how far the projectile travels horizontally in that much time. Use x=vt, where v is horizontal velocity and t is the time you found in part 1.

3. Find the theta that maximizes the distance you found in step 2.

(Edit: I just realized I misread "qualitative" as "quantitative". What a donk. The prof, I mean. What good is a qualitative explanation? Prove it or don't, I say.)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2007, 02:26 AM
BruceZ BruceZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,078
Default Re: question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

The horizontal distance it travels is directly related to 2 things: a) how long it takes to fall to the ground (air time), and b) the velocity in the horizontal direction. The air time is maximized when we shoot it straight up, but then the horizontal velocity is zero. The horizontal velocity is maximized when we shoot it straight forward with no inclination, but then the air time is zero since it hits the ground immediately. Since hang time varies from 0 to 90 degrees in the same way that horizontal velocity varies in the opposite direction from 90 to 0 degrees, the distance is maximized when both factors contribute equally, which occurs at 45 degrees.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2007, 07:41 AM
Prodigy54321 Prodigy54321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 5,326
Default Re: question from my Physics 1 class (qualitative explanation?)

thanks for the help guys
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.