#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [200nl] Rivered top pair, but woooot?!
i don't know how this is a question, really simple fold i think.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [200nl] Rivered top pair, but woooot?!
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not a no limit expert, but would a check be a horrible play on the river? It is obvious you have two big cards, so they will suspect you have the queen. Maybe you can induce a bluff from the button. [/ QUOTE ] 1/2 PSB will get called by a weak queen, mayb even a strong nine... coz they all thinks he's bluffing, stupid donks |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [200nl] Rivered top pair, but woooot?!
Ez fold, checking the river is missing so much value its sick, bet fold to the c/r ai is good here.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [200nl] Rivered top pair, but woooot?!
Those very few who say they'd call - what do you expect to see here? I don't think the Negreanuish "I can't put you on a hand so I call" moves really work although that's a valid way to pick off bluffs.
The thing is - WHY?! would he do this. The pot isn't too significant/worth getting involved in - even if you're a shortie. I actually have a theory of what he could have here that'd "make perfect sense" and that something has me drawing dead on flop. And yea I gave away the result of the hand there too by saying it's a theory. I infact folded and he did not show. |
|
|