|
|
#441
02-06-2007, 07:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: STTF [censored] thread February
[ QUOTE ]
I was told to ask this here, so here I go. It is harder to multi-table shorthanded STTs because it is your time to act a lot more often than in longhanded ones. [/ QUOTE ] No. It is harder because shorthanded STTs involve more post-flop play. [ QUOTE ] I would assume this leads to a smaller share of players in the shorthanded STTs are multi-tablers than in longhanded ones, and those who do multi-table play on average fewer tables than the multi-tablers in longhanded STTs. [/ QUOTE ] I assume the same. [ QUOTE ] This means that in an average shorthanded STTs, a smaller share of the players are multi-tabling compared to the share in longhanded tournaments. But I donīt know how much smaller. This leads me to this question: If you are single-tabling a 6-seat STT on Stars, how many of the other players can you expect to be multi-tabling? [/ QUOTE ] I multi-table 10-seat STT on Party, and it is unusual to see more than 1 player on more than one table. It is extremely rare to see 3 or more players on more than one table. I only look at other tables I'm on, but since I'm typically playing every single $55 that is running when I'm playing I think I get good coverage. [ QUOTE ] 3? 2? 1? 0,5? Something else? [/ QUOTE ] I would guess 1. [ QUOTE ] The reason why I ask this is that when I encounter a player I have met before, it would be nice to know how likely it is he is a multi-tabler as that would effect how much of my play he has noticed. If he is multi-tabling, he probably only has PAHUD-stats on me, and if he is single-tabling he has a more complete picture of me. As the optimal strategy against a multi-tabler and a single-tabler is different, it would be nice to know how likely it is a random player is a multi-tabler. [/ QUOTE ] From the tone and implications of your post, I think the changes you are making to your strategy when playing against single tabler might be flawed. If they are playing only one table at a time, they are probably poor players. I can not imagine any good player confining themselves to one table (except in odd situations like if they were recording a video for an instrucional website, or if they were finishing a set, or if they were doing homework or something at the same time) |
|
#443
02-06-2007, 07:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STTF [censored] thread February
wut it do sttf playa partnaz
 Yugoslav |
|
#444
02-06-2007, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STTF [censored] thread February
wtf is that hangign from your ear?
|
|
#445
02-06-2007, 07:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STTF [censored] thread February
that's hot
|
|
#446
02-06-2007, 08:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STTF [censored] thread February
[ QUOTE ]
wtf is that hangign from your ear? [/ QUOTE ] CHROMED OUT LADIEZ PETITE SNAP WATCH BITCH, SUCK ON THAT GOOD2CU. Yugoslav |
|
#450
02-06-2007, 08:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STTF [censored] thread February
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] how does one become a "balla" [/ QUOTE ] Be the author of this form. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, the way your post was phrased didn't make any sense srykthx. The other way to become balla is to work all day in your office with CHROMED OUT WATCH ON YOUR EAR FLAVA FLAV 2007 STYLE 4TW OMG! Yugoslav |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
