PA HUD is extremely buggy peace of software

pokermac · #1 02-05-2007, 07:49 AM

buy a mac - run in under parallels - PAHUD has worked flawlessly for me - both on XP on a wintel box and on my mac under Parallels.

runstop · #2 02-05-2007, 10:10 AM

Yeah, PAHUD is awesome. Never had a problem with it. I'm gonna go with 'user error' on this one.

Gregg777 · #3 02-05-2007, 11:14 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I'm gonna go with 'user error' on this one.

[/ QUOTE ]

Mahtimies · #4 02-05-2007, 01:05 PM

[ QUOTE ]

Yeah, PAHUD is awesome. Never had a problem with it. I'm gonna go with 'user error' on this one.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I think you are right. That's why only 294834 people suddenly started posting about this POS acting up once again yesterday on the pahud message boards.

Gregg777 · #5 02-05-2007, 01:23 PM

Why would 294834 people buy a POS?

Josh already explained the interruption.

Mahtimies · #6 02-05-2007, 01:31 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Why would 294834 people buy a POS?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ask Bill Gates.

Gregg777 · #7 02-05-2007, 01:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why would 294834 people buy a POS?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ask Bill Gates.

[/ QUOTE ]

Funny, but not accurate.

pokermac · #8 02-05-2007, 06:16 PM

it may be a POS - but for me it has performed flawlessly, 6-8 tabling at Full Tilt on WinXP on an intel PC and on WIN XP virtualized on Parallels, running on Mac OS X.

Never a problem. Not once.

Bill Gates · #9 02-06-2007, 01:13 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why would 294834 people buy a POS?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ask Bill Gates.

[/ QUOTE ]

I take personal offense to that.

Nice work, PokerAce.

ramsclub · #10 02-05-2007, 04:50 PM

[ QUOTE ]

Yeah I think you are right. That's why only 294834 people suddenly started posting about this POS acting up once again yesterday on the pahud message boards.

[/ QUOTE ]
ignore this poster all 7 of his post have been worthless trolling

PA is great I hate using GT+ on BD