|
|
#11
02-03-2007, 03:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 UB 98s vs TAG
[ QUOTE ]
So he'll bet more when we are ahead than he'll call. [/ QUOTE ] Wow I can't disagree more. Who checks this turn behind with Ax and then bluffs the river? C/C is pretty bad here IMO. 
|
|
#12
02-03-2007, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 UB 98s vs TAG
[ QUOTE ]
I think this might be a check-fold. [/ QUOTE ] What's drawing me into this viewpoint is the two opponents' mutual awareness. Asking ace-highs and underpairs to put a fellow TAG on a Qx desperation bluff isn't giving him much credit: your flop call made those hands wary enough, and the modest pot size will help him towards good folds. If he elects to bet, you're getting taken to Valuesdale every time by higher middle pairs that may have turned one-card draws and wanted to take the play away from you.
|
|
#13
02-03-2007, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 5/10 UB 98s vs TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So he'll bet more when we are ahead than he'll call. [/ QUOTE ] Wow I can't disagree more. Who checks this turn behind with Ax and then bluffs the river? C/C is pretty bad here IMO. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with Mcgahee. If y'all think he won't payoff with ace high then C/F, but I see alot of 2+2ers calling down light against each other, and if I'm hero I'm betting both 8x and QT on the river and he has a close decision with ace high.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
