#1
|
|||
|
|||
No Limit Hold\'em: Theory and practice
page 33 says that JJ is a 4.5:1 dog vs. AA preflop. Does someone know how to calculate those odds?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No Limit Hold\'em: Theory and practice
[ QUOTE ]
page 33 says that JJ is a 4.5:1 dog vs. AA preflop. Does someone know how to calculate those odds? [/ QUOTE ] Well, you need to figure out how the JJ hand can beat AA. It can win with a Jack on board (AND no Ace), or with any straight to the J, Q, or K (except 9TJQK), or with a four-flush that doesn't include one of the Ace suits. If you include all those straights and flushes, it becomes a more than trivial probability problem, so the practical way is to run out a simulation a few million times and let it tell you how often the JJ wins. Depending on suits, it generally comes out to between 79 and 81 percent, or about 4 to 4.5 to 1. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No Limit Hold\'em: Theory and practice
Lots of random boards.
If you want an at-the-table estimate, you can use the 2% rule. JJ has 2 outs 5 time so 2 * 5 * 2% = 20% chance of winning, which is a 4:1 dog. Not exact, but close enough. The extra .5 in the real number is AA's redraw to better trips. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No Limit Hold\'em: Theory and practice
[ QUOTE ]
Lots of random boards. If you want an at-the-table estimate, you can use the 2% rule. JJ has 2 outs 5 time so 2 * 5 * 2% = 20% chance of winning, which is a 4:1 dog. Not exact, but close enough. The extra .5 in the real number is AA's redraw to better trips. [/ QUOTE ] JJ also has more ways to make a straight although that percentage is probably not very high. As well, the suits count for something for four flush boards. I like your math approach though because it is easy to do and you don't really need to be that accurate in most circumstances. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No Limit Hold\'em: Theory and practice
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Lots of random boards. If you want an at-the-table estimate, you can use the 2% rule. JJ has 2 outs 5 time so 2 * 5 * 2% = 20% chance of winning, which is a 4:1 dog. Not exact, but close enough. The extra .5 in the real number is AA's redraw to better trips. [/ QUOTE ] JJ also has more ways to make a straight although that percentage is probably not very high. As well, the suits count for something for four flush boards. I like your math approach though because it is easy to do and you don't really need to be that accurate in most circumstances. [/ QUOTE ] The "2% rule" is helpful when counting outs for draws after the flop, but you really need to have at your fingertips all the qualitatively different preflop hand matchups (esp. for tournament play). Examples: Overpair vs. Underpair: 4.5 to 1 (~82%) Underpair vs. Overcards: 6 to 5 (~55%) Pair vs. One overcard: 7 to 3 (~70%) Overpair vs. Two undercards: 6.5 to 1 (~87%) Overcards vs. Live undercards: 3 to 2 (~60%) One overcard vs. Live cards: 3 to 2 (~60%) There are several other permutations, but generally, you'll want to have these down cold for decisions before the flop. Some things (like suitedness & connectedness) affect these percentages a bit, but these are in the ballpark. IIRC, the Miller/Sklansky NLHETAP book has all of these given somewhere near the back. I'm sure Harrington does too. |
|
|